Key result
Baseline disability was associated with a lower likelihood of having positive versus negative illness perceptions over 12 months (RRR 0.37; 95% CI 0.25-0.54).
Why the study?
The study was conducted to describe illness perceptions in RA patients over their first year of MTX treatment and to assess the association between illness perceptions and outcomes.
How do illness perceptions change over the first year of methotrexate therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, and how do they associate with outcomes?
Cohort (n=1,087)
Yes
How do illness perceptions change over the first year of methotrexate therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, and how do they associate with outcomes?
Relative Risk: 0.37 (95% CI 0.25–0.54)
Negative illness perceptions in rheumatoid arthritis patients starting methotrexate are associated with poorer patient-reported outcomes over time.
Illness perceptions during early MTX warrant clinical attention; leaves open whether modifying them improves RA outcomes.
OBJECTIVES: To describe the illness perceptions of patients with RA over the first year of MTX treatment, and the association between illness perceptions and outcomes. METHODS: Data came from the Rheumatoid Arthritis Medication Study (RAMS), a UK multicentre cohort study of RA patients starting MTX for the first time. Patients were assessed at baseline, and at 6 and 12 months. Patients completed the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (B-IPQ) at each assessment, as well as other patient-reported outcomes (PROs). The inflammation score (2-component DAS28) was calculated. Subgroups of patients with similar trajectories across the eight (B-IPQ) items were identified using a latent class growth model. Predictors of group membership were identified using multinomial logistic regression. Associations between subgroups and PROs over follow-up were assessed using linear mixed models. RESULTS: Three subgroups were identified in the analysis population (N = 1087): Positive illness perceptions (N = 322), Negative illness perceptions (N = 534) and Improvers (N = 231) who switched from negative to positive illness perceptions over follow-up. Baseline disability was associated with group membership [Positive vs Negative: relative risk ratio (RRR) 0.37, 95% CI: 0.25, 0.54; Improvers vs Negative: RRR 0.60, 95% CI: 0.43, 0.83], as were other PROs (pain, fatigue, anxiety, depression). The Negative group had worse disability, pain and fatigue over follow-up compared with the other groups, controlling for inflammation. CONCLUSION: Negative illness perceptions are associated with poor PROs over time. The Improvers subgroup illustrated that illness perceptions can change in RA. Illness perceptions represent a potential therapeutic target that should be assessed using randomized trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gwinnutt et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Rheumatoid arthritis (n=1,087). Baseline disability was evaluated on Positive vs Negative illness perception group membership (RRR 0.37, 95% CI 0.25-0.54). Baseline disability was associated with a lower likelihood of having positive versus negative illness perceptions over 12 months (RRR 0.37; 95% CI 0.25-0.54).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: