Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Advanced nitrogen (N) advisory systems require target values of N supply for the crop and the results of soil testing for inorganic nitrogen (N min) before cultivation and estimates of N release from mineralization. Two field experiments with different N supply levels were conducted in the Beijing region to determine the target values of N supply and N mineralization rates for optimization of N fertilization of Chinese cabbage (Brassica campestris L. ssp. Pekinensis) and carrot (Daucus carota L.). Crop yield, N uptake, and soil inorganic N were investigated during the crop growth periods. Marketable yields of the two crops increased significantly with N application rate, and were described as linear-plateau functions (Chinese cabbage: Y = 0.16N + 80.5, when 0 < N ≤ 319; Y = 112.7, when N ≥ 319; and carrot: Y = 0.12N + 50.5, when 0 < N ≤ 247; when Y = 67.1, N ≥ 247; where: Y was marketable yield, t FW ha−1; N was N supply level, the sum of soil inorganic N at preplanting and applied fertilizer N, kg N ha−1). Similar trends were also observed in crop N uptake. The agronomically effective N supply levels for Chinese cabbage and carrot growth in Beijing region were 349 and 277 kg N ha−1, respectively, for target marketable yields of 120 t FW ha−1 for Chinese cabbage and 65 t FW ha−1 for carrot considering extra 30 kg N ha−1 of fertilizer to avoid the risk of crop yield reduction. During the crop growth period net N mineralization in the root zone was 38 kg N ha−1 for Chinese cabbage and 46 kg N ha−1 for carrot. Weekly N mineralization rate was about 3.2 kg N ha−1. Nitrogen loss coefficient, defined as the ratio of average weekly apparent N loss to N supply level, ranged from −0.011 to 0.053 for the different N supply levels in the two experiments. The N net mineralization rates determined, N loss rates and target values were found to be useful for prediction of optimum N supply based on N balance calculations for sustainable vegetable production.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: