Key result
Diluted thrombin time highly correlated with liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (R = 0.9799) and outperformed Hemoclot Thrombin Inhibitor in the low to intermediate range (p=0.05).
Why the study?
Does a diluted thrombin time assay reliably measure plasma dabigatran concentrations compared to liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=44)
Does a diluted thrombin time assay reliably measure plasma dabigatran concentrations compared to liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Effect estimate: Pearson's R = 0.9799
Diluted thrombin time reliably measures low to intermediate plasma dabigatran concentrations, correlating closely with LC-MS/MS and outperforming other functional assays.
May support dabigatran monitoring in AF; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Direct oral anticoagulant dabigatran was first introduced as a fixed-dose drug without routine coagulation monitoring, but current recommendations suggest that diluted thrombin time can be used to estimate plasma drug level. The aim of this study was to assess a diluted thrombin time assay based on the same thrombin reagent already used for traditional thrombin time measurements that reliably measure low to intermediate plasma dabigatran levels. METHODS: We included 44 patients with atrial fibrillation who started treatment with dabigatran 150 mg (23 patients) or 110 mg (21 patients) twice a day. Blood samples were collected at baseline (no dabigatran) and 2-4 weeks after the beginning of dabigatran therapy at trough and at peak. Plasma dabigatran levels were measured with diluted thrombin time and compared to liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry as the reference method. The performance of the diluted thrombin time was compared to Hemoclot® Thrombin Inhibitor and Ecarin Chromogenic Assay. RESULTS: In ex vivo plasma samples, diluted thrombin time highly correlated with the liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (Pearson's R = 0.9799). In the low to intermediate range (dabigatran concentration ≤ 100 µg/L) diluted thrombin time correlated significantly more closely to the liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (R = 0.964) than Hemoclot® Thrombin Inhibitor (R = 0.935, p = 0.05) or Ecarin Chromogenic Assay (R = 0.915, p < 0.01). It was also the only functional assay without any significant bias in the low to intermediate range. Both trough and peak diluted thrombin time values were similar to liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the diluted thrombin time assay presented in this study reliably detects dabigatran and that it is superior to the Hemoclot® Thrombin Inhibitor assay in the low to intermediate range.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mijovski et al. (2015) conducted an observational in atrial fibrillation (n=44). Diluted thrombin time assay vs. Liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry was evaluated on Correlation of diluted thrombin time with liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (Pearson's R = 0.9799). Diluted thrombin time highly correlated with liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (R = 0.9799) and outperformed Hemoclot Thrombin Inhibitor in the low to intermediate range (p=0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: