Key result
Surgical treatments for extracapsular hip fractures in adults will be assessed in a planned Cochrane network meta-analysis to determine their relative benefits, harms, and outcome hierarchy.
Why the study?
The study was designed to assess the relative benefits and harms of all surgical treatments for extracapsular hip fractures in adults and establish a hierarchy of interventions.
Do different surgical treatments vary in their benefits and harms for adults with extracapsular hip fractures?
Do different surgical treatments vary in their benefits and harms for adults with extracapsular hip fractures?
This is a protocol for a network meta-analysis to evaluate surgical treatments for extracapsular hip fractures.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Planned network meta-analysis will clarify surgical option rankings for extracapsular hip fractures; leaves open current comparative effectiveness until completion.
This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Intervention). The objectives are as follows: To assess the relative effects (benefits and harms) of all surgical treatments used in the management of extracapsular hip fractures in adults, using a network meta-analysis of randomised trials, and to generate a hierarchy of interventions according to their outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sreekanta et al. (2019) studied this question. Surgical treatments for extracapsular hip fractures in adults will be assessed in a planned Cochrane network meta-analysis to determine their relative benefits, harms, and outcome hierarchy.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: