Key result
ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome was associated with a significantly higher risk of mortality (RR 1.83) and severely abnormal ECG (RR 1.48) compared to non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome.
Why the study?
The authors aimed to systematically compare complications during hospitalization and at 30 days in the ICCU between patients with STE ACS versus NSTE ACS.
Does STE ACS compared to NSTE ACS increase the risk of complications and mortality in patients admitted to the intensive cardiac care unit?
Meta-Analysis (n=25,604)
Does STE ACS compared to NSTE ACS increase the risk of complications and mortality in patients admitted to the intensive cardiac care unit?
Relative Risk: 1.83 (95% CI 1.64–2.04)
p-value: p=0.00001
In patients admitted to intensive cardiac care units, STE ACS is associated with a significantly higher risk of in-hospital and 30-day mortality and severely abnormal ECGs compared to NSTE ACS, whereas NSTE ACS is associated with a higher risk of recurrent angina.
Supports subtype-specific ICCU monitoring for STE ACS; confirms higher mortality risk versus NSTE ACS in Level 1 evidence.
BACKGROUND: In this meta-analysis, we aimed to systematically compare the complications during hospitalization and at 30 days respectively, in intensive cardiac care unit (ICCU) for patients with ST elevation (STE) vs non-STE acute coronary syndrome (NSTE ACS). METHODS: Electronic search databases including http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov, EMBASE, Cochrane Central, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and MEDLINE were searched for publications comparing complications observed in STE ACS vs NSTE ACS patients admitted in ICCU, intensive care unit (ICU) or coronary care unit (CCU). This is a meta-analysis and risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to illustrate the data following analysis by the RevMan 5.3 software. RESULTS: Six studies consisting of a total number of 25,604 participants (12,880 participants admitted due to STE ACS and 12,724 participants admitted due to NSTE ACS) were included. Our results showed that the total outcomes including severely abnormal electrocardiography (ECG) (RR: 1.48, 95% CI: 1.27-1.73; P = .00001) and mortality (RR: 1.83, 95% CI: 1.64-2.04; P = .00001) were significantly higher in patients with STE ACS. Re-infarction (RR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.62-1.19; P = .37) and heart failure (RR: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.88-1.23; P = .62) were similarly manifested in those patients with ACS. However, the risk for recurrent angina was significantly higher with NSTE ACS (RR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.46-0.92; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with STE ACS were at a higher risk for in-hospital and 30 days mortality in this analysis. In hospital, severely abnormal ECG was also significantly higher in this category of patients compared to NSTE ACS. However, re-admission for heart failure and re-infarction was similar in both groups. Future studies should be able to confirm this hypothesis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2020) conducted a meta-analysis in Acute coronary syndrome (n=25,604). ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome vs. Non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome was evaluated on Mortality (in hospital and at 30 days) (RR 1.83, 95% CI 1.64-2.04, p=0.00001). ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome was associated with a significantly higher risk of mortality (RR 1.83) and severely abnormal ECG (RR 1.48) compared to non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: