Key result
Implementation of a fast track surgery protocol significantly reduced the average length of stay for hip and knee arthroplasty from 8.72 to 7.61 days, saving €445.85 per patient.
Why the study?
Hospitals face rising expenditures due to an aging population requiring hip and knee arthroplasty, prompting evaluation of whether a fast track surgery protocol via Lean Six Sigma could reduce length of stay and costs.
Does a fast track surgery protocol implemented using lean Six Sigma reduce length of stay and hospital costs in patients undergoing knee and hip arthroplasty?
Observational (n=165)
Does a fast track surgery protocol implemented using lean Six Sigma reduce length of stay and hospital costs in patients undergoing knee and hip arthroplasty?
Implementing a fast track surgery protocol using lean Six Sigma methodology significantly reduces length of hospital stay and costs for patients undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Fast-track protocols may reduce arthroplasty length of stay and costs; leaves open the specific contribution of lean Six Sigma pending prospective trials.
Purpose One of the biggest challenges in the health sector is that of costs compared to economic resources and the quality of services. Hospitals register a progressive increase in expenditure due to the aging of the population. In fact, hip and knee arthroplasty surgery are mainly due to primary osteoarthritis that affects the elderly population. This study was carried out with the aim of analysing the introduction of the fast track surgery protocol, through the lean Six Sigma, on patients undergoing knee and hip prosthetic replacement surgery. The goal was to improve the arthroplasty surgery process by reducing the average length of stay (LOA) and hospital costs Design/methodology/approach Lean Six Sigma was applied to evaluate the arthroplasty surgery process through the DMAIC cycle (define, measure, analyse, improve and control) and the lean tools (value stream map), adopted to analyse the new protocol and improve process performance. The dataset consisted of two samples of patients: 54 patients before the introduction of the protocol and 111 patients after the improvement. Clinical and demographic variables were collected for each patient (gender, age, allergies, diabetes, cardiovascular diseases and American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) score). Findings The results showed a 12.70% statistically significant decrease in LOS from an overall average of 8.72 to 7.61 days. Women patients without allergies, with a low ASA score not suffering from diabetes and cardiovascular disease showed a significant a reduction in hospital days with the implementation of the FTS protocol. Only the age variable was not statistically significant. Originality/value The introduction of the FTS in the orthopaedic field, analysed through the LSS, demonstrated to reduce LOS and, consequently, costs. For each individual patient, there was an economic saving of € 445.85. Since our study takes into consideration a dataset of 111 patients post-FTS, the overall economic saving brought by this study amounts to €49,489.35.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Latessa et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Knee and hip prosthetic replacement surgery (n=165). Fast track surgery protocol (FTS) vs. Before protocol introduction was evaluated on Average length of stay (LOS) (12.70% decrease). Implementation of a fast track surgery protocol significantly reduced the average length of stay for hip and knee arthroplasty from 8.72 to 7.61 days, saving €445.85 per patient.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: