Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Little information exists regarding water and N fertilizer management for sugarcane ( Saccharum spp.) production on Florida's high‐water‐table sandy soils. We hypothesized that sugar yield and N‐use efficiency would be affected by water table depth and N fertilizer application timing. Sugarcane (cv. CP 72‐1210) was grown in >1‐ha plots for three seasons on Basinger sand (siliceous, hyperthermic Spodic Psammaquent) to determine the effects of water table depth (0.46 vs. 0.57 m), N fertilization frequency (13 vs. 7 split applications for 3 yr, at 224 kg N ha ‐1 yr ‐1 ), and Mg fertilizer rate (0 vs. 60 kg Mg ha ‐1 yr ‐1 ) on cane and sugar yields. Annual mean high‐ and low‐water‐table differences were 0.13, 0.11, and 0.10 m, resulting in a 0.2 to 1.4 J kg ‐1 difference in soil water matric potential at middle of the root zone, and a 0.02 to 0.11 m 3 m ‐3 difference in soil water concentration in the top 0.30 m. Three‐year mean yields for low vs. high water table were 73.7 vs. 67.9 t sugarcane ha ‐1 and 9.23 vs. 8.51 t sugar ha ‐1 . High vs. low N fertilization frequency yielded 75.0 vs. 66.5 t sugarcane ha ‐1 and 9.41 vs. 8.33 t sugar ha ‐1 . There were no water level × N fertilization frequency interactions. Where mean Mehlich 1 extractable Mg was 25 mg kg ‐1 , Mg fertilization did not affect yield, suggesting that this Mg level should be classified in the unresponsive (“high”) range. Although increasing N fertilization frequency increases the fertilization program cost, its use is justified by increased sugar yield.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Obreza et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: