Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: Research to examine the immediate effects of electrical stimulation combined with passive locomotion-like movement on gait velocity and spasticity. DESIGN: A single-masked, randomized controlled trial design. SUBJECTS: Twenty-seven stroke inpatients in subacute phase (ischemic n = 16, hemorrhagic n = 11). INTERVENTIONS: A novel approach using electrical stimulation combined with passive locomotion-like movement. MAIN MEASURES: We assessed the maximum gait speed and modified Ashworth scale before and 20 minutes after the interventions. RESULTS: The gait velocity of the electrical stimulation combined with passive locomotion-like movement group showed the increase form 0.68 ± 0.28 (mean ± SD, unit: m) to 0.76 ± 0.32 after the intervention. Both the electrical stimulation group and passive locomotion-like movement group also showed increases after the interventions (from 0.76 ± 0.37 to 0.79 ± 0.40, from 0.74 ± 0.35 to 0.77 ± 0.36, respectively). The gait velocity of the electrical stimulation combined with passive locomotion-like movement group differed significantly from those of the other groups (electrical stimulation combined with passive locomotion-like movement versus electrical stimulation: P = 0.049, electrical stimulation combined with passive locomotion-like movement versus passive locomotion-like movement: P = 0.025). Although there was no statistically significant difference in the modified Ashworth scale among the three groups, six of the nine subjects (66.6%) in the electrical stimulation combined with passive locomotion-like movement group showed improvement in the modified Ashworth scale score, while only three of the nine subjects (33.3%) in the electrical stimulation group and two of the nine subjects (22.2%) improved in the passive locomotion-like movement group. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest electrical stimulation combined with passive locomotion-like movement could improve gait velocity in stroke patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yamaguchi et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: