Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Intercalation of HgBr 2 into Bi 2 Sr 1.5 - x La x Ca 1.5 Cu 2 O y (0.0 ≤ x ≤ 0.4) superconductor has been carried out in order to elucidate the origin of T c evolution upon intercalation. The T c 's obtained from the dc magnetic susceptibility measurements were plotted against x . The plot of T c vs x for the pristines showed the parabolic feature with overdoped (0.0 ≤ x < 0.1), optimally doped ( x = 0.1), and underdoped (0.2 ≤ x ≤ 0.4) regions. The T c 's of the HgBr 2 intercalates in the overdoped region were reduced less than ∼6 K but increased by 4−6 K in the underdoped one compared with nonintercalated samples. Such changes in T c upon intercalation indicate hole doping from intercalant to host lattice. An attempt of semiempirical calculation was made to determine the hole concentration doped by intercalation. Upon HgBr 2 intercalation, the amount of hole doping was estimated to be ∼0.2 hole per formula unit of the sample with x = 0.0, whereas the doping of ∼0.3 hole was estimated for the iodine intercalated sample. Considering the T c depression (Δ T c ) and lattice expansion (Δ d ) between the iodine intercalate (Δ T c ≈ 10 K and Δ d ≈ 3.6 Å) and the HgBr 2 one (Δ T c ≈ 6 K and Δ d ≈ 6.3 Å), it can be concluded that the change in T c upon intercalation clearly depends on the hole concentration due to the charge transfer between host and guest, rather than the interblock electronic coupling due to the lattice expansion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Choy et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: