Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Phosphorus (P) is both an essential element for pasture and animal production and a limiting nutrient for nuisance weed and algal growth in many New Zealand water bodies. Research results, mainly measured under mowing, have shown that pasture production increased with fertiliser P application up to a target range of soil Olsen P values (20-30 mg/L for sedimentary and Allophanic soils; 35-45 mg/L for Pumice and Organic soils). A dairy farmlet trial in Taranaki on an Egmont Allophanic soil measured small increases in pasture production and larger economic responses in milksolids (MS) production as Olsen P levels increased from 30-50 in a management system with high stocking rates and a long lactation. The relative response in pasture production to Olsen P was similar under mowing and grazing, indicating that the MS response to high Olsen P measured on Allophanic soils would also apply to other soils. Only small amounts of dissolved P (< 1 kg/ha) are required to promote nuisance weed and algal growth in water bodies. P can be sourced from soil, fertiliser and dung and transported in dissolved and particulate forms from soil to water through overland and subsurface runoff flow. Data from a P runoff study on different soils is presented which shows that the potential for P to be lost to water bodies increases with Olsen P level. On a high anion storage capacity (ASC) Egmont Allophanic soil (83%), the concentration of dissolved reactive P (DRP) in overland flow was lower than the critical level of 0.03 mg/L at Olsen P levels of 20-110 mg/L. In contrast, on the more weakly weathered Waikoikoi Pallic soil with low ASC (15%), the critical DRP level was exceeded at an Olsen P of about 30 mg/L, and on the moderately weathered Waikiwi Brown soil (ASC 49%), at an Olsen P of about 50 mg/L. These results indicate that there is a greater risk of P enrichment of surface water bodies in areas with low ASC than in areas with high ASC soils.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Monaghan et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: