Key result
Baseline CRP levels ≥3 mg/L were associated with increased cardiovascular risk in both hormone therapy users (RR 1.93; 95% CI 1.38-2.69) and nonusers (RR 1.92; 95% CI 1.35-2.72).
Why the study?
Do C-reactive protein (CRP) levels predict incident cardiovascular events similarly among oral postmenopausal hormone therapy users and nonusers?
Cohort (n=26,791)
Do C-reactive protein (CRP) levels predict incident cardiovascular events similarly among oral postmenopausal hormone therapy users and nonusers?
CRP levels of 3 mg/L or higher are associated with similarly increased cardiovascular risk in both postmenopausal hormone therapy users and nonusers, indicating the same cut-points can be used regardless of HT status.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May allow uniform CRP thresholds for CV risk assessment in postmenopausal women regardless of HT; hypothesis-generating pending prospective validation.
OBJECTIVES: This study examines C-reactive protein (CRP) levels predicting cardiovascular events (CVEs) among hormone therapy (HT) users and nonusers. METHODS: CRP levels are higher in women who use oral HT than those in nonusers; however, whether the same CRP cut-points determine increased cardiovascular risk remains unanswered. CRP was measured at baseline in 10,953 HT users and 15,838 nonusers in the Women's Health Study. In HT nonusers and users, Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for age, cardiovascular risk factors, body mass index, and menopause status were constructed using American Heart Association/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommended CRP cut-points for low, average, and high cardiovascular risk as well as HT nonuser- and user-derived quantiles of CRP to predict incident CVEs. RESULTS: CVE risk increased with logarithm CRP for both HT users and nonusers. After adjusting for cardiovascular risk factors including lipids, the multivariable relative risk (RR) per log unit of CRP was 1.27 (95% CI, 1.13-1.44) for HT nonusers and 1.22 (95% CI, 1.07-1.40) for HT users. To compare the risk associated with American Heart Association/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention CRP categories across HT use groups, we fit a model in which nonusers with a CRP level lower than 1 mg/L were the reference group. After adjusting for other risk factors including lipids, HT users with a CRP level of 3 mg/L or higher had an RR of 1.93 (1.38-2.69), whereas nonusers had an RR of 1.92 (1.35-2.72). CONCLUSIONS: CRP predicts CVE in a linear relationship among both HT users and nonusers. CRP levels of 3 mg/L or higher were associated with increased cardiovascular risk in both nonusers and HT users.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kurtz et al. (2010) conducted a cohort in Cardiovascular events (n=26,791). C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥3 mg/L vs. CRP <1 mg/L was evaluated on Incident cardiovascular events (RR 1.93, 95% CI 1.38-2.69). Baseline CRP levels ≥3 mg/L were associated with increased cardiovascular risk in both hormone therapy users (RR 1.93; 95% CI 1.38-2.69) and nonusers (RR 1.92; 95% CI 1.35-2.72).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: