Key result
Cardiac rehabilitation services lack substantive evidence clearly examining their cost-effectiveness, complicated by difficulties in defining and interpreting cost and effectiveness data.
Why the study?
Are cardiac rehabilitation services cost-effective?
Are cardiac rehabilitation services cost-effective?
This review highlights the challenges and lack of substantive evidence in determining the cost-effectiveness of cardiac rehabilitation services amidst growing economic pressures.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Uncertainty over cardiac rehabilitation cost-effectiveness warrants caution in resource decisions; leaves open the need for standardized economic evaluations in trials.
With health care costs exceeding $500 billion in the United States in 1990, efforts to contain costs will continue to intensify. More than ever before, new and established therapies will be scrutinized for medical benefit and cost. Prospective payment by diagnosis-related groups (DRG) for inpatients insured by Medicare was the first step by the federal government to control costs. More federal controls on outpatient services can be expected, with private insurers to follow. These economic pressures have stimulated increasing interest in cost-efective care. Cardiac rehabilitation services have come under increased scrutiny, and conflicting guidelines have been published regarding their applicability. Little substantive evidence exists that cleurly examines the cost-effectiveness of cardiac rehabilitation. This problem exists in virtually all aspects of medicine, and is related to the definition of cost-efectiveness and the interpretation of data regarding cost and effectiveness. This paper will discuss the dificulties in determining cost-effectiveness of cardiac rehabilitation services, and review the available data in this important area.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
C Dennis (1991) conducted a review in Cardiac rehabilitation. Cardiac rehabilitation services was evaluated on Cost-effectiveness. Cardiac rehabilitation services lack substantive evidence clearly examining their cost-effectiveness, complicated by difficulties in defining and interpreting cost and effectiveness data.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: