Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We present the results of ROSAT All-Sky Survey observations of Seyfert and IR luminous galaxies from the extended 12 μm galaxy sample and the optically selected CfA sample. Detections are available for 80% (44/55) of the Seyfert 1's and 34% (23/67) of the Seyfert 2's in the 12 μm sample, and for 76% (26/34) of the Seyfert 1's and 38% (6/16) of the Seyfert 2's in the CfA Sample. Roughly half of the Seyfert galaxies (mostly Seyfert 1's) have been fitted to an absorbed power-law model, yielding an average photon index of Γ = 2.26 ± 0.11 for 43 Seyfert 1's and Γ = 2.45 ± 0.18 for 10 Seyfert 2's, with both types having a median value of 2.3. The soft X-ray luminosity corelates with the 12 μm luminosity, with Seyfert 1's, having relatively more soft X-ray emission than Seyfert 2's of similar mid-IR luminosities by factor of 1.6 ± 0.3. Several physical interpretaions of these results are discused, including the standard unified model for Seyfert galaxies. Infrared luminous non-Seyferts are shown to have similar disributions of soft X-ray luminosity and X-ray-to-IR slope as Seyfert 2's suggesting that some of them may harbor obscured active nuclei (as has already ben shown to be true for several objects) and/or that the soft X-rays from some Seyfert 2's may be nonnuclear. A soft X-ray luminosity function (XLF) is calculated for the 12 μm sample, which is described well by a single power law with a slope of −1.75. The normalization of this XLF agrees well with that of a hard X-ray selected sample. Several of our results, related to the XLF and the X-ray-to-IR relation, are shown to be consistent with the hard x-ray observations of the 12 μm sample by barcons et al.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rush et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: