Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Optical spectra of 65 x-ray-selected active galactic nuclei (XAGN) from several identification samples are presented. From analysis of their spectra and optical-continuum luminosities, the XAGN are classified as follows: 13 quasars or QSOs, ten narrowline Seyfert 1 galaxies, three Seyfert 1.5s, three Seyfert 2s, one Seyfert 1.9, one H II-region-like galaxy, and three galaxies with very weak emission. The remaining XAGN are most likely Seyfert 1 galaxies. The "red XAGN" of Stocke et al. (1983), which they originally thought might be a new class of low-luminosity object, appear to be a mix of previously known types of objects-Seyfert galaxies and galaxies with weak emission. Their red colors seem to be caused by starlight. X-ray selection may be an efficient way to find narrowline Seyfert 1 galaxies. One possible explanation stems from the possibility that some, or all, narrowline Seyfert 1s are pole-on Seyfert 2 galaxies. In this picture, the material that obscures the broadline region of Seyfert 2 galaxies is in a disk that is optically thick to the broadline- region emission and to x rays. Viewed edge-on, it looks like a Seyfert 2, but along the axis of the disk, x rays can escape, the featureless continuum will be less obscured, and Fe II emission might be visible, all features associated with narrowline Seyfert 1s. A possible spectral discriminant between quasars and QSOs on the one hand, and Seyfert 1 galaxies on the other, is seen. The presence of all of four spectral features-an excess of emission in the UV, a continuum that rises to the blue, broad permitted lines, and the absence of spectral absorption features-in the spectrum of an unknown object strongly suggests that it may be a quasar or QSO, but it is necessary to look for high optical-continuum luminosity to be sure. However, an object without all four features is most likely not a quasar or QSO. Larger samples of quasars, QSOs, and Seyfert 1 galaxies are necessary to confirm this discriminant.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sally A. Stephens (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: