Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A temperature-dependent photoluminescence study is reported for single crystals of M[Au(CN) 2 ] 3 and M[Ag(CN) 2 ] 3 (M = Tb; Gd; Y). The results indicate that in both Tb[Au(CN) 2 ] 3 and Tb[Ag(CN) 2 ] 3 exclusive excitation of the donor leads to sensitized luminescence for the acceptor, characteristic of the 5 D 4 → 7 F J ( J = 0−6) transition of Tb(III). However, the sensitized luminescence is much stronger in Tb[Ag(CN) 2 ] 3 than in Tb[Au(CN) 2 ] 3 due to a larger spectral overlap between the [Ag(CN) 2 - ] emission and the Tb(III) absorption. Upon increasing the temperature, energy transfer is enhanced in Tb[Ag(CN) 2 ] 3 but inhibited in Tb[Au(CN) 2 ] 3 . In Tb[Ag(CN) 2 ] 3, a large spectral overlap exists between the [Ag(CN) 2 - ] donor emission and the Tb(III) acceptor absorption at all temperatures. The Tb(III) sensitized emission is strong at all temperatures and is enhanced upon a temperature increase while the [Ag(CN) 2 - ] emission is quenched. An activation energy of 53.7 cm - 1 (±2.5 cm - 1 ) has been calculated for the energy transfer process in Tb[Ag(CN) 2 ] 3 . In Tb[Au(CN) 2 ] 3, the Tb(III) sensitized luminescence decreases upon increasing the temperature. The [Au(CN) 2 - ] emission is strong and does not undergo a complete quenching as the temperature increases toward room temperature. The [Au(CN) 2 - ] emission undergoes a red shift upon cooling, which leads to an increased spectral overlap with the 5 D 4 → 7 F 6 absorption band of Tb(III); thus energy transfer is tuned by controlling the temperature. The sensitized luminescence intensity of Tb(III) in Tb[Au(CN) 2 ] 3 is directly proportional to the numerical value of the donor−acceptor spectral overlap, in agreement with the theory of radiationless energy transfer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rawashdeh‐Omary et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: