Key result
Rural patients undergoing surgery for acute Type A aortic dissection had significantly higher rates of postoperative return to theatre (OR 7.60) compared to urban patients, with no statistically significant difference in 30-day mortality (30% vs 16%, p=0.314).
Why the study?
Acute Type A Aortic Dissection requires emergency management, but it was unknown whether presentation and outcomes differ between rural and urban patients in Western Australia.
Does rural presentation compared to urban presentation worsen outcomes in patients undergoing emergent repair for acute Type A Aortic Dissection?
Cohort (n=64)
No
Does rural presentation compared to urban presentation worsen outcomes in patients undergoing emergent repair for acute Type A Aortic Dissection?
Rural patients with acute Type A aortic dissection face significantly longer times to surgery and higher rates of postoperative return to theatre compared to urban patients, highlighting the need for streamlined regional transfer protocols.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support enhanced rural transfer protocols for acute Type A aortic dissection; hypothesis-generating for reducing reoperations.
Background:Acute Type A Aortic Dissection (TAAD) represents a cardiothoracic emergency and should be managed without delay. Western Australia is an expansive state with a network of regional centres and cardiothoracic centres located in the capital Perth. The aim of this study is to assess the differences in presentation and outcomes between rural and urban patients undergoing emergent repair for an acute TAAD. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing emergent repair of a TAAD at Fiona Stanley Hospital between 2015 to 2020. A number of variables associated with the patient’s geography, physiology, and postoperative outcome were assessed. Univariate and multivariate logistical regression analysis was performed to evaluate significant differences between the cohorts. Results:A total of 64 patients underwent emergent repair of a TAAD between 2015 – 2020. The overall 30-day mortality rate was 20%. The 30-day mortality rate in the rural cohort was higher than the urban cohort (30% vs 16%) however this was not statistically significant. The rural cohort faced a higher median time to surgery (12 vs 6 hours, P = 0.002) and are likely to require transfer between more than two centres (7 vs 1, P = 0.001). Rural patients were also more likely to require resuscitation perioperatively (OR 4.33, P = 0.013) and more likely to require return to theatre post operatively (OR 7.60, P = 0.002). Both return to theatre and multi-hospital transfer were associated with rural status in multivariate analysis. ConclusionRural patients wait twice as long for definitive surgery as their urban counterparts and require multi-hospital transfer. Rural patients are more likely to present in a critical peri-operative state requiring resuscitation, and have a significantly higher risk of returning to theatre post operatively.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eranki et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection (TAAD) (n=64). Rural status vs. Urban status was evaluated on 30-day mortality (OR 2.27, 95% CI 0.648-7.92, p=0.314). Rural patients undergoing surgery for acute Type A aortic dissection had significantly higher rates of postoperative return to theatre (OR 7.60) compared to urban patients, with no statistically significant difference in 30-day mortality (30% vs 16%, p=0.314).
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: