Key result
This abstract presents a protocol for a prospective, non-randomised, open-label study evaluating telemedicine and distance learning applications for chronic heart failure; no results are reported.
Why the study?
Do telemedicine and tele-education applications improve days alive without worsening heart failure and time to hospitalization in patients with NYHA II-III chronic heart failure?
Do telemedicine and tele-education applications improve days alive without worsening heart failure and time to hospitalization in patients with NYHA II-III chronic heart failure?
This protocol outlines a prospective, non-randomized study to evaluate whether the addition of telemedicine and tele-education to standard care improves clinical outcomes and quality of life in patients with chronic heart failure.
Non-randomized HF telemedicine protocol leaves efficacy open; results may generate hypotheses but should not change practice.
INTRODUCTION: Chronic heart failure in Baltic Sea Region is responsible for more hospitalisations than all forms of cancer combined and is one of the leading causes of hospitalisations in elderly patients. Frequent hospitalisations, along with other direct and indirect costs, place financial burden on healthcare systems. We aim to test the hypothesis that telemedicine and distance learning applications is superior to the current standard of home care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Prospective parallel group non-randomised open label study in patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) II-III chronic heart failure will be carried out in six Baltic Sea Region countries. The study is organised into two 6-month follow-up periods. The first 6-month period is based on active implementation of tele-education and/or telemedicine for patients in two groups (active run period) and one standard care group (passive run period). The second 6-month period of observation will be based on standard care model (passive run period) to all three groups. Our proposed practice change is based on translational research with empirically supported interventions brought to practice and aims to find the home care model that is most effective to patient needs. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by National Bioethics Committee (2011-03-07; Registration No: BE-2-11). TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study has been registered in Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) with registration number ACTRN12611000834954.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vanagas et al. (2012) studied Chronic heart failure. Telemedicine and distance learning applications vs. Standard of home care was evaluated. This abstract presents a protocol for a prospective, non-randomised, open-label study evaluating telemedicine and distance learning applications for chronic heart failure; no results are reported.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: