Key result
A high intraventricular conduction delay before biventricular pacing (126 ms in responders vs 36 ms in nonresponders, p<0.01) and decreased left ventricular strain shortly after pacing predicted long-term clinical improvement.
Why the study?
Do tissue Doppler imaging and strain Doppler imaging predict long-term clinical improvement in patients with advanced heart failure receiving biventricular pacing?
Cohort (n=17)
Do tissue Doppler imaging and strain Doppler imaging predict long-term clinical improvement in patients with advanced heart failure receiving biventricular pacing?
Absolute Event Rate: 126% vs 36%
p-value: p=<0.01
A high intraventricular conduction delay before biventricular pacing and decreased strain shortly after pacing can predict long-term clinical improvement in patients with advanced heart failure.
May aid CRT candidate selection in advanced HF; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the utility and efficacy of tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) and strain Doppler imaging (SDI) for evaluating ventricular synchrony and function, and for predicting the long-term clinical improvement in patients undergoing biventricular pacing (BVP). METHODS AND RESULTS: TDI and SDI were performed before and <1 month after initiating BVP in 17 patients with advanced heart failure. An intraventricular conduction delay between the left ventricular (LV) septal and lateral walls was measured by TDI. The average LV strain (LV-strain) was calculated from data obtained at the center of 6 regions of the LV (base and mid-point between the basal and apical portions, and the mid-point between these 2 points on the septal and lateral walls). During a 23+/-7 month follow-up period, 12 patients improved clinically and did not require re-hospitalization for heart failure (responder group), but the remaining 5 did not improve (nonresponder group). Before BVP, the intraventricular conduction delay was greater in the responder group than in the nonresponder group (p<0.01), but after BVP, it did not differ between the 2 groups. LV-strain improved after BVP in the responder group but not in the nonresponder group (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: A high intraventricular conduction delay before BVP and decreased strain shortly after BVP may predict long-term clinical improvement in patients undergoing this treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tada et al. (2005) conducted a cohort in Advanced heart failure (n=17). Biventricular pacing vs. Nonresponders was evaluated on Baseline intraventricular conduction delay (ms) (p=<0.01). A high intraventricular conduction delay before biventricular pacing (126 ms in responders vs 36 ms in nonresponders, p<0.01) and decreased left ventricular strain shortly after pacing predicted long-term clinical improvement.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: