Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Urinary biomarkers are usually reported as a normalized ratio to creatinuria, a lack of correct creatinine determination lead to wrong final data. This study aimed to evaluate the Jaffè method accuracy, proposing a new HPLC-MS/MS method. The validation parameters were: run time of 4 min, LOD of 0.02 mg/L, CV% lower than 4%, recovery >96.1%, no matrix effect. The comparison between HPLC-MS/MS and Jaffè method showed an average bias, variable from high (1.5–3.00 g/L) to low concentrations (below than 0.7 g/L) of creatinine, ranging from +31% to −25%. The critical issue for the normalization of biomonitoring data was highlighted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Caporossi et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: