Key result
Atorvastatin was more effective than simvastatin-based therapies in achieving target LDL < 3.5 mmol/l (63% vs. 50%; p < 0.001) in patients with severe hyperlipidaemia, but increased side effects.
Why the study?
Does atorvastatin improve lipid profiles compared to simvastatin-based therapies in patients with severe familial hyperlipidaemia?
Population
201 patients with severe hyperlipidaemia (familial hypercholesterolaemia)
Comparison
Atorvastatin (10 mg, 20 mg, 40 mg, or 80 mg) vs Simvastatin-based therapies
Design
Cohort
Authors
Loading...
May support atorvastatin preference for LDL targets in severe hyperlipidaemia; observational data leave open randomized confirmation amid side-effect trade-offs.
Observational (n=201)
Does atorvastatin improve lipid profiles compared to simvastatin-based therapies in patients with severe familial hyperlipidaemia?
Absolute Event Rate: 63% vs 50%
p-value: p=< 0.001
Atorvastatin is more effective than simvastatin-based therapies in achieving LDL targets in severe familial hyperlipidaemia, though potentially with an increase in side effects.
Anthony S. Wierzbicki (1999) conducted an observational in Severe hyperlipidaemia (n=201). Atorvastatin vs. Simvastatin-based therapies was evaluated on Target LDL < 3.5 mmol/l (p=< 0.001). Atorvastatin was more effective than simvastatin-based therapies in achieving target LDL < 3.5 mmol/l (63% vs. 50%; p < 0.001) in patients with severe hyperlipidaemia, but increased side effects.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: