This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
INTRODUCTION: In several conditions, outcome stability is a great challenge for Orthodontics. Previous studies have reported that relapse commonly occurs along the years after orthodontic treatment finishing. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to evaluate in the long-term transversal dental arch changes of Class II division 1 patients treated with cervical headgear and fixed appliance. METHODS: Plaster study casts of 20 patients treated with cervical headgear without dental extractions were 3D-scanned and evaluated in three distinct times: initial (T1), immediate post-treatment (T2) and long-term retention (T3 - minimum 20 years). Transversal teeth distance of maxillary and mandibular canines, premolars and first molars were measured. RESULTS: A statistically significant increase during treatment was observed for all maxillary teeth transversal distances (p< 0.05). In turn, a significant reduction was observed in the long term (p< 0.05). For the mandibular teeth, canine transversal distance presented statistically significant constriction in the retention period (p< 0.05). Mandibular first molars distance was significantly expanded by treatment (p< 0.05) and remained stable in the long term. The changes observed for the other teeth or other times were considered not statistically relevant. CONCLUSIONS: For the accessed sample, transversal changes occurred during treatment and retention phases in Class II division 1 patients treated with cervical headgear and fixed appliance. Relapse was considered statistically relevant, even with the institution of a retention protocol.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oliveira et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: