Key result
Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation significantly improved No-Go response accuracy compared to sham stimulation (p=0.026) by reducing the information accumulation rate for Go responses.
Why the study?
Although transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) has been hypothesized to improve behavioral inhibition, the underlying neurocomputational mechanisms remain elusive.
Does transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation improve inhibitory control in healthy adults?
RCT (n=82)
Single-blind
Randomly assigned
No
Does transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation improve inhibitory control in healthy adults?
Effect estimate: partial η2 0.061
p-value: p=0.026
Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation improves inhibitory control by reducing pre-potent responses and enhancing prefrontal functional connectivity.
taVNS enhances inhibitory control in healthy adults; extends vagal neuromodulation evidence and supports trials in executive dysfunction.
Inhibitory control represents a core executive function that critically facilitates adaptive behavior and survival in an ever-changing environment. Non-invasive transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) has been hypothesized to improve behavioral inhibition performance, however the neurocomputational mechanism of taVNS-induced neuroenhancement remain elusive. In the current study, we investigated the effect of taVNS on inhibitory control in a pre-registered sham-controlled between-subject functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) experiment with an emotional face Go/No-Go paradigm in ninety subjects. After data quality check, eighty-two subjects were included in the final data analysis. Behaviorally, the taVNS improved No-Go response accuracy, together with computational modeling using Hierarchical Bayesian estimation of the Drift Diffusion Model (HDDM) indicating that it specifically reduced the information accumulation rate for Go responses, and this was negatively associated with increased accuracy of No-Go responses. On the neural level, taVNS enhanced engagement of the bilateral inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) during inhibition of angry expression faces and modulated functional couplings (FCs) within the prefrontal inhibitory control network. Mediation models revealed that taVNS-induced facilitation of inhibitory control was critically mediated by a decreased information accumulation for Go responses and concomitantly enhanced neurofunctional coupling between the inferior and orbital frontal cortex. Our findings demonstrate a striking potential for taVNS to improve inhibitory control via reducing pre-potent responses and enhancing FCs within prefrontal inhibitory control networks, suggesting a promising therapeutic role in treating specific disorders characterized by inhibitory control deficits.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhu et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in Healthy (n=82). Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation vs. Sham stimulation (earlobe) was evaluated on Accuracy of No-Go trials (ACC_No-Go) (partial η2 0.061, p=0.026). Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation significantly improved No-Go response accuracy compared to sham stimulation (p=0.026) by reducing the information accumulation rate for Go responses.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: