Key result
Bibliometric analysis of 2,077 articles revealed a steady growth in publications on exercise training for heart failure with cognitive impairment, with the United States as the major contributor.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to examine the current state and trends in research on exercise training for heart failure patients with cognitive impairment.
This bibliometric analysis highlights the growing research interest and key contributors in the field of exercise training for heart failure patients with cognitive impairment.
Concentrated US output signals rising interest in exercise for HF with cognitive impairment; leaves open translation to clinical practice.
This study, using bibliometric methods, examines exercise training for Heart Failure (HF) patients with cognitive impairment, discussing the current state and trends. 2,077 articles and reviews from the Web of Science Core Collection were analyzed, revealing the United States and Duke University Research Institute as major contributors. “Circulation” and “American Journal of Cardiology” were the selected and most-cited journals. Kitzman DW emerged as the most productive author. VOSviewer and Microsoft Excel 2019 were employed for comprehensive analysis, categorizing keywords into heart failure, cardiovascular disease, mortality, and exercise clusters. The findings provide valuable insights into the landscape and evolving dynamics of exercise training in the context of HF and cognitive impairment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hanyan et al. (2023) studied Heart failure with cognitive impairment (n=2,077). Exercise training was evaluated on Bibliometric trends (publication volume, countries, institutions, journals, authors, keywords). Bibliometric analysis of 2,077 articles revealed a steady growth in publications on exercise training for heart failure with cognitive impairment, with the United States as the major contributor.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: