Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 (NCM811) | SiOx‐graphite (SiO‐Gr.) battery chemistry is of intensive attention because its achievable practical energy density is approaching impressively 300 Wh Kg−1. However, it still suffers rapid capacity fades during repeated cycles, both chemical, electrochemical and mechanical irreversibility contribute. A comprehensive understanding behind the fading behavior of the cell chemistry is required before fully realize the benefits of this chemistry. Herein, the in‐situ thickness variation is introduced as a diagnostic technique and is performed on 5–55 Ah NCM811|SiO‐Gr cells. With the help of Li reference electrode and in‐situ X‐ray diffraction device, the correspondence between thickness variation and the electrode potential is carefully investigated. Firstly, the NCM811|SiO‐Gr cell is characterized with the maximum cell thickness at around 80% state‐of‐charge (SOC) in the discharge process, rather than at 100% SOC. Secondly, the electrochemical behaviors during rate charge/discharge are diagnosed, and a Li platting signal is resolved from thickness variation profile at 2C. This work confirms that the thickness monitoring is a nondestructive and informative complement to conventional diagnostic techniques for failure analysis of pouch cells.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: