Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Recent studies have shown that MHC class I molecules play an important role in the protective immune response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Here we showed that mice deficient in MHC class Ia, but possessing MHC class Ib (K(b-/-)D(b-/-) mice), were more susceptible to aerosol infection with M. tuberculosis than control mice, but less susceptible than mice that lack both MHC class Ia and Ib (beta(2)m(-/-) mice). The susceptibility of K(b-/-)D(b-/-) mice cannot be explained by the failure of CD8(+) T cells (presumably MHC class Ib-restricted) to respond to the infection. Although CD8(+) T cells were a relatively small population in uninfected K(b-/-)D(b-/-) mice, most already expressed an activated phenotype. During infection, a large percentage of these cells further changed their cell surface phenotype, accumulated in the lungs at the site of infection, and were capable of rapidly producing IFN-gamma following TCR stimulation. Histopathologic analysis showed widespread inflammation in the lungs of K(b-/-)D(b-/-) mice, with a paucity of lymphocytic aggregates within poorly organized areas of granulomatous inflammation. A similar pattern of granuloma formation has previously been observed in other types of MHC class I-deficient mice, but not CD8alpha(-/-) mice. Thus, neither the presence of MHC class Ib molecules themselves, nor the activity of a population of nonclassical CD8(+) effector cells, fully restored the deficit caused by the absence of MHC class Ia molecules, suggesting a unique role for MHC class Ia molecules in protective immunity against M. tuberculosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Urdahl et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: