The effect of culture on women's appraisals of moral and conventional dilemmas was investigated. American, Sicilian, and Sicilian-American adult subjects evaluated four social breach episodes by using Q methodology (Kerlinger, 1973; Stephenson, 1953). For each story, rank-order coefficients of correlation were calculated. An extremity-of-rating mixed-model analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied to the mean scores of the Q-sort episodes. The results indicated that Sicilian-American women interpreted the moral and conventional dilemmas differently from all other groups: They favored moral reasoning, whereas Sicilians, Americans, and Sicilian-American men relied strongly on socio-conventional thinking when evaluating the social conflicts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Emily Comstock Dimartino (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: