Key result
Self-management programs for heart failure are discussed as an important yet challenging issue, though no specific quantitative study results are reported in this abstract.
Why the study?
Do self-management programs improve quality of life and health-related outcomes in heart failure patients?
Do self-management programs improve quality of life and health-related outcomes in heart failure patients?
The paper highlights the importance and challenges of implementing self-management programs to improve quality of life and health outcomes in patients with heart failure.
The most common cause of mortality in the world is cardiovascular disease [1]. Heart failure (HF) is a chronic and complex disease that has led to a serious challenge in the world due to its high incidence and mortality rate [2]. In the United States from 2011 to 2014, 6.5 million people aged ≥20 suffer from HF. It is estimated that the prevalence of HF will increase by 46% by 2030 and the number of HF patients over the age of 18 will increase to more than 8 million [3]. Hence, maintaining and promoting physical, mental, psychological, spiritual, and social health is very important and necessary in patients with HF [4]. Patients with HF are usually treated with different medication regimens due to the many and varied diagnoses, which ultimately lead to adverse outcomes such as increased length of stay in the hospital and reduced quality of life due to the complexity of treatment and its complications [5].
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miri et al. (2023) conducted a review in Heart failure. Self-management programs was evaluated. Self-management programs for heart failure are discussed as an important yet challenging issue, though no specific quantitative study results are reported in this abstract.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: