Key result
Semi-quantitative assessment of left ventricular contractile reserve by experienced readers achieved significant prognostic separation for 5-year mortality (log rank 18.99, p < 0.001).
Why the study?
Does semi-quantitative assessment of left ventricular contractile reserve by dobutamine stress echocardiography provide feasible and prognostic information compared to quantitative assessment in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy?
Cohort (n=63)
Does semi-quantitative assessment of left ventricular contractile reserve by dobutamine stress echocardiography provide feasible and prognostic information compared to quantitative assessment in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy?
p-value: p=<0.001
Semi-quantitative assessment of left ventricular contractile reserve during dobutamine stress echocardiography is highly feasible and provides strong prognostic value for mortality in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy.
Supports prognostic utility of semi-quantitative contractile reserve in dilated cardiomyopathy; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: We and others have shown previously that left ventricular (LV) contractile reserve assessed quantitatively by high-dose dobutamine stress-echocardiography (DSE) has prognostic implications in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility of semi-quantitative assessment of LV contractile reserve by differently skilled operators in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. METHODS: High-dose DSE was performed in 63 consecutive patients, mean age 50 ± 10 years and ejection fraction (EF) 19 ± 8%. LVEF was calculated 1) using Simpson's biplane formula, and 2) semi-quantitatively (5% increments) by novice and experienced echocardiographers, and by a DSE expert. Patients were considered to have preserved LV contractile reserve if LVEF dobutamine-induced change was ≥5%. RESULTS: Twenty-seven (45.8%) patients died during the 5-year follow-up. The feasibility of the assessment was 89%, 94%, and 98% for novice and experienced readers and DSE expert, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that LV contractile reserve assessed semi-quantitatively by DSE expert and experienced reader achieved the best prognostic separation (log rank 19.63 and 18.99, respectively, p < 0.001 for both), followed by quantitative assessment (log rank 9.76, p = 0.0018) and assessment by novice reader (log rank 8.76, p = 0.012). Areas under the curves were similar for quantitative and semi-quantitative assessment of LV contractile reserve. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that semi-quantitative assessment of LV contractile reserve is feasible by differently skilled operators.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Otašević et al. (2012) conducted a cohort in Dilated cardiomyopathy (n=63). Semi-quantitative assessment of LV contractile reserve by high-dose dobutamine stress-echocardiography vs. Quantitative assessment was evaluated on Prognostic separation for mortality (p=<0.001). Semi-quantitative assessment of left ventricular contractile reserve by experienced readers achieved significant prognostic separation for 5-year mortality (log rank 18.99, p < 0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: