Key result
Loss-of-function KCNH2 variants were significantly enriched in SUDEP patients compared to older epilepsy controls (8.9% vs 3.3%, OR 2.7), suggesting a genetic cardiac contribution to SUDEP risk.
Why the study?
To compare the frequency and impact on channel function of KCNH2 variants between SUDEP patients and epilepsy controls with low SUDEP risk, and establish loss-of-function variants as predictive biomarkers.
Does the presence of loss-of-function KCNH2 variants increase the risk of SUDEP in patients with epilepsy?
Case-Control (n=422)
Yes
Does the presence of loss-of-function KCNH2 variants increase the risk of SUDEP in patients with epilepsy?
Odds Ratio: 2.7 (95% CI 1.1–7.4)
Absolute Event Rate: 8.9% vs 3.3%
p-value: p=0.04
Loss-of-function variants in the KCNH2 gene (associated with Long QT syndrome) are enriched in SUDEP patients, suggesting a cardiac arrhythmic contribution to SUDEP risk.
KCNH2 loss-of-function variants may increase SUDEP risk; leaves open whether genetic screening should guide epilepsy management.
Objective To compare the frequency and impact on channel function of KCNH2 variants in SUDEP patients with epilepsy controls comprising patients older than 50 years, a group with low SUDEP risk, and establish loss-of-function KCNH2 variants as predictive biomarkers of SUDEP risk. Methods We searched for KCNH2 variants with a minor allele frequency of < 5%. Functional analysis in Xenopus laevis oocytes was performed for all KCNH2 variants identified. Results KCNH2 variants were found in 11.1% (10/90) of SUDEP individuals compared to 6.0% (20/332) of epilepsy controls ( p = 0.11). Loss-of-function KCNH2 variants, defined as causing > 20% reduction in maximal amplitude, were observed in 8.9% (8/90) SUDEP patients compared to 3.3% (11/332) epilepsy controls suggesting about three-fold enrichment (nominal p = 0.04). KCNH2 variants that did not change channel function occurred at a similar frequency in SUDEP (2.2%; 2/90) and epilepsy control (2.7%; 9/332) cohorts ( p > 0.99). Rare KCNH2 variants (< 1% allele frequency) associated with greater loss of function and an ∼11-fold enrichment in the SUDEP cohort (nominal p = 0.03). In silico tools were unable to predict the impact of a variant on function highlighting the need for electrophysiological analysis. Conclusions These data show that loss-of-function KCNH2 variants are enriched in SUDEP patients and suggest that cardiac mechanisms contribute to SUDEP risk. We propose that genetic screening in combination with functional analysis can identify loss-of-function KCNH2 variants that could act as biomarkers of an individual’s SUDEP risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Soh et al. (2021) conducted a case-control in Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) (n=422). Loss-of-function KCNH2 variants vs. Epilepsy controls (low SUDEP risk) was evaluated on Frequency of loss-of-function KCNH2 variants (>20% reduction in maximal amplitude) (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.1, 7.4, p=0.04). Loss-of-function KCNH2 variants were significantly enriched in SUDEP patients compared to older epilepsy controls (8.9% vs 3.3%, OR 2.7), suggesting a genetic cardiac contribution to SUDEP risk.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: