Key result
A retinal TIA event was a significant predictor for delayed carotid artery stenting beyond 14 days (OR 3.59), whereas a contralateral carotid occlusion predicted early treatment.
Why the study?
What clinical and procedural factors are associated with a time delay of ≥14 days to carotid artery stenting in patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis?
Observational (n=374)
Yes
What clinical and procedural factors are associated with a time delay of ≥14 days to carotid artery stenting in patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis?
Odds Ratio: 3.59 (95% CI 1.47–8.74)
p-value: p=<0.01
Despite guidelines recommending carotid revascularization within 14 days of a symptomatic event, the majority of patients experience delayed treatment, particularly those presenting with retinal TIA, highlighting the need for accelerated admittance strategies.
Retinal TIA was associated with delayed carotid stenting; leaves open whether expedited pathways can reduce delays in this subgroup.
Treatment of a symptomatic stenosis is known to be most beneficial within 14 days after the presenting event but this can frequently not be achieved in daily practice. The aim of this study was the assessment of factors responsible for this time delay to treatment. A retrospective analysis of a prospective two-center CAS database was carried out to investigate the potential factors that influence a delayed CAS treatment. Of 374 patients with a symptomatic carotid stenosis, 59.1% were treated beyond ≥14 days. A retinal TIA event (OR = 3.59, 95% CI 1.47-8.74, p < 0.01) was found to be a predictor for a delayed treatment, whereas the year of the intervention (OR = 0.32, 95% CI 0.20-0.50, p < 0.01) and a contralateral carotid occlusion (OR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.21-0.86, p = 0.02) were predictive of an early treatment. Similarly, within the subgroup of patients with transient symptoms, the year of the intervention (OR = 0.28, 95% CI 0.14-0.59, p < 0.01) was associated with an early treatment, whereas a retinal TIA as the qualifying event (OR = 6.96, 95% CI 2.37-20.47, p < 0.01) was associated with a delayed treatment. Treatment delay was most pronounced in patients with an amaurosis fugax, whereas a contralateral carotid occlusion led to an early intervention. Although CAS is increasingly performed faster in the last years, there is still scope for an even more accelerated treatment strategy, which might prevent future recurrent strokes prior to treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gröschel et al. (2011) conducted an observational in Symptomatic carotid artery stenosis (n=374). Retinal TIA event vs. Other symptomatic events was evaluated on Delayed carotid artery stenting treatment (>14 days) (OR 3.59, 95% CI 1.47-8.74, p=<0.01). A retinal TIA event was a significant predictor for delayed carotid artery stenting beyond 14 days (OR 3.59), whereas a contralateral carotid occlusion predicted early treatment.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: