Key result
Continuous infusion of lidocaine significantly reduced intraoperative propofol (44.3 mg vs 74.5 mg) and sufentanil requirements during pediatric colonoscopy compared to placebo.
Why the study?
To investigate the effect of intravenous lidocaine on perioperative propofol and sufentanil dosage, pulse oxygen saturation, postoperative pain score, and recovery time during pediatric colonoscopy.
Does continuous intravenous lidocaine reduce propofol and sufentanil requirements and oxygen desaturation in children undergoing colonoscopy?
RCT (n=80)
Double-blind
Sealed envelopes
No
Does continuous intravenous lidocaine reduce propofol and sufentanil requirements and oxygen desaturation in children undergoing colonoscopy?
Continuous intravenous lidocaine during pediatric colonoscopy significantly reduces the required doses of propofol and sufentanil, shortens recovery time, and decreases the risk of hypoxemia.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports adjunctive lidocaine to minimize anesthetic exposure during pediatric colonoscopy; extends adult evidence to children.
Background: To investigate the effect of intravenous lidocaine on perioperative propofol and sufentanil dosage, pulse oxygen saturation, postoperative pain score and recovery time during pediatric colonoscopy.Methods: We designed a randomized placebo-controlled study and enrolled 80 children aged from 3 to 10 years old who were received colonoscopy. After titration of propofol to achieve unconsciousness, patients were given intravenous lidocaine (1.5 mg kg-1 then 2 mg kg-1 h-1) or the same volume of saline. Sedation was standardized and combined propofol with sufentanil. The primary outcome variables were intraoperative propofol and sufentanil requirements and number of oxygen desaturation episodes. Secondary outcome variables were recovery time after colonoscopy and post-colonoscopy pain.Results: Lidocaine infusion resulted in a significant reduction in propofol requirements: mean (SD) 44.3 (9.9) vs 74.5 (12.0) mg, respectively; P<0.001) and sufentanil requirements: mean (SD) 1.5 (0.3) vs 2.6 (0.6) ug respectively; p<0.001). The number of subjects who experienced oxygen desaturation below 95% in the lidocaine group was also significantly less than that in the control group: 2 vs 8 (P=0.04). The mean (SD) recovery time was significantly shorter in lidocaine group: 19.2 (2.6) vs 13.3 (2.6) min respectively; p<0.001). There were no significant difference regarding post-colonoscopy pain.Conclusions: Continuous infusion of lidocaine resulted in reduction of propofol and sufentanil dose, recovery time and risk of hypoxemia during pediatric colonoscopy.Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trials Registry, ChiCTR2000028927, 8 January, 2020, prospectively registered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yuan et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in Pediatric colonoscopy (n=80). Lidocaine vs. Saline was evaluated on Intraoperative propofol requirements during infusion of study medications (mg) (p=<0.001). Continuous infusion of lidocaine significantly reduced intraoperative propofol (44.3 mg vs 74.5 mg) and sufentanil requirements during pediatric colonoscopy compared to placebo.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: