Key result
Evaluation of DVT prophylaxis in the ICU revealed that only 32.61% of patients received the correct prophylaxis, highlighting a significant medication error rate.
Why the study?
What proportion of ICU patients receive appropriate DVT prophylaxis according to the Caprini risk assessment model?
Observational (n=52)
No
What proportion of ICU patients receive appropriate DVT prophylaxis according to the Caprini risk assessment model?
A significant proportion (67.39%) of ICU patients did not receive appropriate DVT prophylaxis, highlighting a critical gap in guideline implementation and a need for medical team education.
Suboptimal ICU DVT prophylaxis adherence highlights implementation gaps requiring education; leaves open whether interventions reduce events in future trials.
Background: One of the main causes of morbidity in hospitalized patients, and especially in the intensive care unit (ICU), is venous thromboembolism (VTE). The best way to deal with VTE is prophylaxis. Rational prophylaxis should be provided after risk factor anal- ysis. Dierent prophylaxis regimens are pharmacological and physical. Pharmacological prophylaxis regimens consist of heparin and enoxaparin that are given subcutaneously. Objectives: The current study aimed to investigate appropriate administration of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis in ICU in an educational hospital. Methods: Caprini risk assessment model was employed to evaluate patients' risk factors. Immobile patients (for three days) with at least one thrombotic risk factor were selected. The Caprini scores were identified from patients' medical record. Three groups were identified after obtaining the scores: patients at low, medium and high risks. For each group, appropriate prophylaxis regimen was recommended. Results: A total of 52 patients were evaluated, about 88.46% of the subjects had DVT prophylaxis indication; 10.71% received physical prophylaxis and 89.29% of them received pharmacological prophylaxis. For two-thirds of the patients with pharmacological pro- phylaxis enoxaparin was administered and for the other part heparin. Totally, 32.61% of the subjects received correct prophylaxis, 17.39% received inadequate prophylactic doses and 6.52% received higher doses. Totally, 67.39% of the subjects did not receive correct prophylaxis. Conclusions: According to the collected data, appropriate DVT prophylaxis was not prescribed. It is required to pay serious atten- tion to this medication error. It is suggested to invest on educating medical teams about DVT prophylaxis, which is highly demanded.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nekoonam et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Intensive care unit patients at risk for venous thromboembolism (n=52). DVT prophylaxis administration was evaluated on Appropriate administration of DVT prophylaxis. Evaluation of DVT prophylaxis in the ICU revealed that only 32.61% of patients received the correct prophylaxis, highlighting a significant medication error rate.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: