Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The electron injection dynamics of Ru II (4,4‘-dicarboxy-2,2‘-bipyridine) 2 (SCN) 2 (the so-called N3-dye) adsorbed on colloidal ZrO 2 particles in room-temperature solution have been studied using time-resolved absorption polarization spectroscopy. The solvents used are acetonitrile and methanol. Electron injection is evidenced by the transient absorption anisotropy and/or the wavelength-dependent unpolarized absorption intensity. The results indicate that 630 nm excitation results in no N3* to ZrO 2 electron transfer in both acetonitrile and methanol solvents, 515 nm excitation results in electron injection in acetonitrile, and 495 nm excitation results in electron injection in both acetonitrile and methanol. These results may be understood in terms of simple energetic considerations: 630 nm excitation produces N3* with insufficient energy for electron injection while 495 nm excitation produces N3* with an energy just sufficient for electron injection. In all cases where electron injection is energetically favorable, it occurs very rapidly, <200 fs. There is no indication of rapid (<5 ps) electron injection into deep trap states on the ZrO 2 surface; however, the possibility of rapid injection into shallow trap states cannot be excluded. The observed kinetics also indicate that, following photoexcitation of the adsorbed N3, the ZrO 2 surface relaxes on the 5−10 ps time scale.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Olsen et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: