Key result
This paper is an award lecture detailing the author's personal and professional journey from Chile to the United States, focusing on the evolution of precision cardiovascular physical therapy.
A personal narrative and award acceptance speech detailing the author's journey in physical therapy and exercise physiology from Chile to the United States.
Offers no direct clinical implications; leaves open the value of narrative accounts for informing future cardiopulmonary physical therapy research.
Good afternoon. I would like to start by thanking the American Physical Therapy Association's Academy of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Physical Therapy, its awards committee, and those who nominated me to receive this prestigious award. I did not have the chance to meet Dr. Linda Crane. According to previous awardees of this award, she was a trailblazer, a great clinician, and a very kind person.1-7 Receiving this award with her name and reading from other trailblazers, great clinicians, and kind persons is humbling to the core. For those who know me, I always say that I am not from this planet, especially when dealing with topics from the American culture. This lecture is a story on how I have found my tribe here in the United States, and how, I hope, the tribe will learn something from my planet. I always like to start my talks with this quote from Albert Einstein, “imagination is more important than knowledge” because I think that creativity and thinking outside the box is always something that we need to encourage our students and colleagues. As some of you know, I am originally from Chile and a former swimmer. Someone once said that Chileans are the British of South America. Not because of a kingdom or really good manners, but because of the sense of isolation. We are way down South, behind the Andes Mountains, beside the driest desert on earth, and bathing in the Pacific Ocean. Back in the old days, nobody wanted to visit because it was hard to get there. People from Europe always ended their journeys either in Brazil or in Argentina, and this is why Brazil and Argentina have much richer cultures and exchanges with the rest of the world. Swimming was my way to escape this sense of isolation. Not that I started swimming my way out in the ocean but by having the chance to travel and see other places. Competing for team Chile, I was able to see the world. I was lucky. I grew up in a stable middle-class family. My dad was an entrepreneur, I knew at least 6 different businesses that he tried and succeeded in and many others where he didn't succeed, and retired as a department store supervisor. He taught me that nothing comes easy and that hard work always pays off. My mom was a high school biology teacher. She taught me about the power of education and science. She was always grading papers and learning new things from different certificates, diplomas, and professional development courses. She still teaches. In fact, my students have learned from her as she has had several health conditions related to PT and cardiovascular pathophysiology that make her the perfect case study. Her last lesson was a perfect cardiopulmonary case when she survived Takotsubo syndrome 9 months ago. This culture of hard work and science ignited a need to learn how things worked. I lost count of how many wristwatches and portable transistor radios I took apart in the 80s. In high school, I thought that engineering was my path as I wanted to create stuff, until we had a biology laboratory where we dissected a rat. It blew my mind away. I wanted to know how the human body worked. It changed the way I would apply for college. As a high-performance swimmer, I always loved physical activity. Therefore, the natural path was … being a swimming coach. I did not want to be a surgeon, which was the second option. I did not know what physical therapy was, as I never got injured and I was never exposed to rehabilitation. But luck struck again. I got accepted to the only Kinesiology school in Chile at that time. Before I move on, I need to disclose some differences between the United States and the Chilean educational systems and show you that the same words can mean different things, especially in different worlds. First, there is not an undergraduate education in Chile. You go from high school to professional school; PT is a five-year degree. The first 2 years you take several general and foundational courses, what would be considered “prerequisite” here in the United States, but these courses are connected to your next 3 years: Two years of PT didactics and 1 years of clinical rotations. It is similar to the United States, but it is straight from high school, which has pros and cons. The pros are that you can get your degree in 5 years instead of 7. The downside is that most of the people are not ready to accomplish high-level learning when they are just 18 years old. There are multiple people who I know, in their third year of PT school are getting into the real PT school content, leave because they discover it is not for them. And when they move to another profession such as medicine, dentistry, law school, etc., they need to start from zero. Some people can think that this five-year model is better, but I think that the undergraduate education here in the United States allows for greater maturity for students to understand what they really want to be. Second, early PT in Chile was influenced by Europe, especially Belgium, where PT is called “Kinésitherapie”, or in Spanish “Kinesioterapia”. Translated that means Kinesiotherapy or therapy through movement. During the late 80s and early 90s, there was only 1 school of Kinesiology or “Kinesiología,” which in Chile means “clinical movement sciences”. This is the school that I went to. It has a focus in 3 applied sciences, critical thinking, and evidence-based practice (EBP). These 3 applied sciences were applied anatomy or biomechanics, applied physiology or exercise physiology, and applied neurology or neurorehabilitation. The other 3 schools that we had in Chile at the time were called “Kinesiterapia”. These schools were more technical schools with less EBP and applied sciences. The professional degree is “Kinesiólogo” or Kinesiologist. That is what PTs are called in Chile. In early 2000, all the schools became kinesiology schools. All the schools that were called “kinesiterapia” saw the value of centering more on applied sciences and EBP than just the technical aspect. Finally, and because of the aforementioned factors, PT practice in Chile looks different than that in the United States. There is no exercise science because we do not have an undergraduate education and people do not have the option to have a bachelor's degree in exercise science, so they go into physical education. It is a professional school because we need teachers in the schools or coaches in the athletic environment. In addition, we do not have athletic trainers. Moreover, we do not have respiratory therapy or chiropractors as professional paths. Chilean PTs do all the above: athletic rehabilitation, respiratory therapy, and spinal manipulation. I like to think about my Chilean colleagues as Swiss Army knives. However, we do not have direct access, except for respiratory therapy during wintertime, where Chilean PTs can diagnose and treat upper respiratory illnesses to prevent hospitalizations and deaths in children and the elderly. My early professional years were full of several interesting activities. First, and as soon as I finished PT school, I did a post-professional diploma in exercise science. I went to Argentina to the Biosystem Institute to work with Dr. Juan Carlos Mazza, who was trained by Dr. David Costill at Ball State University in Indiana, where I learned about the use of lactate metabolism as a marker for exercise intensity. In addition, I got introduced to the American College of Sport Medicine and its annual meeting, which I attended for the first time in 1998. Then I worked as a clinician for 15 years in cardiovascular rehabilitation, sports rehabilitation, and sports performance. My background gave me the tools to be able to combine these 3 things and most of my patients in cardiovascular rehabilitation were training using the same principles as high-performance athletes.8 In 1998, I got an adjunct position in the School of Kinesiology (i.e. Physical therapy) at the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, where I moved up the ladder from a young adjunct professor to tenured faculty. So, what do you do after 15 years in the profession, you have your own clinic with many patients, and athletes that follow you? In fact, I had 2 clinics. I was tenured in a PT school. I was doing research. I was teaching. I was doing service. I was living in a nice place by the beach. So, what would you do? Well, you go back to school. I moved thousands of miles north to the University of Florida to pursue my PhD. I wanted to have a PhD in exercise physiology, something that is not very common right now. During my gator years, I first went to the College of Health and Human Performance in the Department of Applied Physiology and Kinesiology. Dr. Randy Braith accepted me in his laboratory as a research assistant. It was an amazing experience where I learned many noninvasive cardiovascular assessment tools, as well as some invasive techniques such as endothelial cell biopsies. I'll be forever grateful to Randy for taking me into his laboratory. Then, when I finished my PhD, I went to the School of Medicine at the University of Florida Department of Physiology and Functional Genomics to do my postdoc. Instead of having 1 mentor, I had 3 mentors: Dr. Judy Delp who taught me a lot of in situ techniques in vascular biology, Dr. Chris Baylis who was the director of the Hypertension Center at the University of Florida and taught me about vascular regulation in the kidney, and Dr. Debbie Scheuer who taught me about cardiovascular control in the central nervous system. In 2011, it was time to make a decision: to stay or not to stay in the United States? On the one hand, I had my job in Chile, my whole family in Chile except for my wife who was with me, and I found things a little complicated here in the United States. Why are there so many different people working in the same field but do not work together? For example, a clinical exercise physiologist, who has a bachelor's or a master's degree in kinesiology (kinesiologist) with an ACSM certification and working with patients. Well, is not that a PT? Why do we need clinical exercise physiologists if we have PTs? Or a biomechanist with the same bachelor's or master's degree in kinesiology working in biomechanics? I was educated like a PT. We deal with biomechanics every time you treat a patient. Why are they so siloed here? Why things are so different? On the other hand, and even though I was in a kinesiology department, I learned more about the PT world in the United States. I had a spy at the Department of Physical Therapy at University of Florida: My wife Carolina. My wife was pursuing her PhD in Rehabilitation Sciences at the same time as me, under the mentorship of Dr. Steve George who most of you know and is the new editor-in-chief of the PT Journal. So, Carolina introduced me to this PT environment with Steve, Krista Vandenborne, Carolyn Pattern, Mark Bishop, and others, and I was able to understand the differences in clinical practice a little better. However, I really was at the edge of a neuropsychiatric disorder wondering “Who am I”? What can I do with everything I've learned? I was like Jean Valjean from Les Misérables asking “Who am I”?9 I had 3 options: (1) I have to a Kinesiology department as I had a really good and I was in one of the of the I have to a physiology department like many of my and I had another great in physiology through or I go to a PT school where my was very but I knew that they were for PT with As Jean I was not able to my a physical Therefore, I applied to in the United States. There were at least that did not even me an after my I for I have well on the because I for 6 but I only with the or I said that my wife a job and she was her PhD with Steve so it was a for said no and the other 1 said We moved to State University in Indiana, in the of the Indiana, at the of was a good We were an from 3 from and from The is that we learned a during your job We in and in State to their The of the department called to a and said because to in the go except you We need to do this from use your time As I was not the first at I to take the which I in the first in and after I my PT is not that just the In 2 years we accepted our first It was a great the from the up you how to a good PT there are other amazing health and in the United States is not As the did not start until 2 years I taught in the and therapy I learned that some are more than In addition, I was able to learn that are not from the department and nobody that in the PhD In I applied for the director position at The University of at and we moved to that is not the it is the and the experience is We have the students that you can It is a of people that so much to the In I was to full professor and of the new Department of Physical Therapy and I will always be of Dr. who me up at the during my and me the first was not the the environment and culture were and the had so much to is the place I to pursue an in the PT I knew that I had to be in my First, and in the of my to out who I was, I went to my first I that I It was like to the All these with multiple professional clinical exercise physiologists and that did not make a lot of sense in my went when I was able to be physical especially when I saw about syndrome in Then, I went to the cardiovascular and and I was able to learn who and I do have a about It was my first my first and the and I wanted to create a cardiovascular rehabilitation at and I her to her about how I and which I was able to She gave me some great to make it and I had full the director did not the and the the a months a from at an for the she said said I was she that I And that blew my So, you very much for me and new the way you In I went to my second in I had a really and I some of the However, there was 1 that I about the and how can This lecture me out that I was in the right a place with a common This is what I was we can how we can do things than and move the profession I about and to to learn new things to be a clinician and That is when I learned that I was not in this of new and that I was not the only one to clinical In that Chris me to for the I will be always grateful for and the chance she gave me to meet people like and many others at these And I started that I In I started for Physical Therapy I one of my first to and it was in me to my first I have a good job as he me to be a with for a on applied It was a great and I was able to another good with a common with I and about In me to of the and I In down from the and he that I as an In I became the editor-in-chief with an amazing team to the and Chris This is a it is not a I to the but the that we have here are the that really make the in the Journal. And last I into something new for the I am working with and and it has I have learned so much from these amazing That is why the Academy of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary PT is my I to be of this amazing I am so for my And I like I I found my world. I found my For all that you all very show the tribe what I think is PT in cardiovascular rehabilitation. Dr. director of the Human Institute at the and Dr. of the Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation at the University of It was an amazing and Dr. the and background behind the Human and how the to a full human has from to in less than 2 and more will for the of clinical to be able to be by in in the PT. Dr. on the by physical in this For example, Dr. has how can the of the time we every time we have and we have being or the PT especially in exercise will have a direct on there a direct of exercise in several where PTs can be in In the cardiovascular for example, there are a of that of the However, the is considered and there is not to see if these would with physical activity. there other that PTs with their exercise from the cardiovascular According to the and are for of all deaths in we that of all and are with we that of all deaths are with being by the 1 of in the United States. Therefore, if we want to prevent all of these we need to understand we can some we can with our the for either a in or an which an The first is endothelial and is related to a in and an in endothelial According to is the of The endothelial cell to of the vascular by and with being the most which is with an in endothelial a of of of and cell which a and the of The from to a is and years in the on your family and Therefore, when you have a in your it means that you started having when you were in your There are multiple that are with and and are with the same all cardiovascular factors, such as or have to either endothelial or has to be an which the chance of the of and In endothelial health and There are 2 to an and a the is more as it on to for a more natural endothelial cell Then, will on the and will the which is a on the endothelial cell the of the The work from with their model of endothelial by and with their of the were in how the endothelial cell The of the will start 2 of by On the one hand, the of the will and a which are in the of the endothelial and On the other hand, an by and will the cell to different and In addition, of exercise training can and endothelial I learned these different during my PhD and it blew my This was what I was the of biomechanics and physiology and how we can with exercise more with different exercise of PT In during conditions and do not to the during and an in which will the the of to endothelial and of the in and in of that when the endothelial is through On the in endothelial On the in family of endothelial of the and the between and In a of and on one hand, will to to on its on the other hand, and will and and to will from and with the of as an important is or are there is an in through This in will and a in Moreover, will which this and endothelial cell is on as the Therefore, if is than is which will the of the However, if is than to another and and Finally, the show the in and the in after of exercise next is to endothelial is the or that on the endothelial where in the it can be or The the the more and than where is In addition, on which can be or As it to the of on the in the is in and at of will be in There is a direct between at the and However, and has on the that in the during conditions is the for and During will an even in the would at the endothelial Therefore, is not the it is the of that at the The in cardiovascular rehabilitation is exercise a to endothelial For some time we have we are using the right exercise when our cardiovascular And there has some training and that can prevent As in my first in exercise training for cardiovascular patients follow principles of exercise which and In addition, that on and some principles in exercise training and can In fact, and very at the same the model using of in of the as as as a my that clinical of exercise were only at exercise when with more such as Therefore, the with cardiovascular rehabilitation is that (1) we do not follow exercise training principles exercise and we do not have a for the exercise least in my patients, the is to endothelial and endothelial In the years, I have to all of these principles to our PT On the one hand, endothelial and On the other hand, for exercise to our exercise First, we found a model to in the which is a model for the and that we have that (1) is exercise in and than exercise can from to and in the and and most of the is during In addition, our show no differences in and between young and there is a of in patients with Second, we have an in model to the and of endothelial under in to as which is not even and is so from In our we use a that from to for 1 to 6 this we have an in with the after the and an in endothelial cell at the which is These have for the first that high of of the can the and of the endothelial In addition, some using the same model have on and different and to an we are a model of the This model will for in in not only but Finally, my Dr. has working on some into through of endothelial in different lactate with different exercise The are lactate do not to have in time to of These be to in of a human are to in from a the Applied Physiology my a model to the between exercise and and First, we at different exercise in We have this in different and our show an exercise of and Then, we have these in first with the and soon in our own to the and of endothelial Finally, once we know the we will to our in to the exercise to the in our patients. And that is Physical the exercise that will and to the health of our patients. you very much to the Academy of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary PT for this amazing of the Linda I I have Dr. and in the way in which she would have
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alvaro N. Gurovich (2024) studied Cardiovascular disease. This paper is an award lecture detailing the author's personal and professional journey from Chile to the United States, focusing on the evolution of precision cardiovascular physical therapy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: