Key result
After adjusting for classic risk factors, the excess relative risk of CHD mortality in women versus men with diabetes was absent, though men had more CHD deaths attributable to diabetes.
Why the study?
Does the relative risk of CHD mortality due to diabetes differ between men and women after adjusting for classic CHD risk factors?
Meta-Analysis
Does the relative risk of CHD mortality due to diabetes differ between men and women after adjusting for classic CHD risk factors?
Effect estimate: OR 2.9 for women; OR 2.3 for men (95% CI 2.2-3.8 for women; 1.9-2.8 for men)
After adjusting for classic CHD risk factors, the excess relative risk of CHD mortality in women versus men with diabetes is no longer significant, although men have higher absolute CHD death rates attributable to diabetes.
No excess adjusted relative CHD mortality risk in diabetic women vs men; challenges prior unadjusted observations and supports equivalent risk assessment.
Background: Most studies suggest that diabetes is a stronger coronary heart disease (CHD) risk factor for women than men, but few have adjusted their results for classic CHD risk factors: age, hypertension, total cholesterol level, and smoking. Objective: To establish an accurate estimate of the odds ratio for fatal and nonfatal CHD due to diabetes in both men and women. Methods: We compared the summary odds ratio for CHD mortality and the absolute rates of CHD mortality in men and women with diabetes. We searched the MEDLINE and Cochrane Collaboration databases and bibliographies of relevant articles and consulted experts. Studies that included a nondiabetic control group and provided sexspecific adjusted results for CHD mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular or all-cause mortality were included. Of 4578 articles identified, 232 contained primary data, and 182 were excluded. Two reviewers recorded data on study characteristics, quality, and outcomes from 50 studies. Results: Sixteen studies met all inclusion criteria. In unadjusted and age-adjusted analyses, odds of CHD death were higher in women than men with diabetes. From 8 prospective studies, the multivariate-adjusted summary odds ratio for CHD mortality due to diabetes was 2.3 (95% confidence interval, 1.9-2.8) for men and 2.9 (95% confidence interval, 2.2-3.8) for women. There were no significant sex differences in the adjusted risk associated with diabetes for CHD mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular or all-cause mortality. Absolute CHD death rates were higher for diabetic men than women in every age strata except the very oldest. Conclusions: The excess relative risk of CHD mortality in women vs men with diabetes was absent after adjusting for classic CHD risk factors, but men had more CHD deaths attributable to diabetes than women.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kanaya et al. (2002) conducted a meta-analysis in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Coronary Heart Disease. Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus vs. Nondiabetic controls was evaluated on CHD mortality (OR 2.9 for women; OR 2.3 for men, 95% CI 2.2-3.8 for women; 1.9-2.8 for men). After adjusting for classic risk factors, the excess relative risk of CHD mortality in women versus men with diabetes was absent, though men had more CHD deaths attributable to diabetes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: