Key result
Adults with type 2 diabetes had lower aerobic exercise capacity than controls (peak VO2 18.0 vs. 27.8 mL/kg/min; P<0.001), independently determined by myocardial perfusion and diastolic function.
Why the study?
To assess the relationship between subclinical cardiac dysfunction and aerobic exercise capacity in adults with type 2 diabetes, a group at high risk for heart failure.
Cross-Sectional (n=325)
Absolute Event Rate: 18% vs 27.8%
p-value: p=<0.001
In asymptomatic adults with type 2 diabetes, reduced myocardial perfusion reserve and diastolic dysfunction are key independent drivers of impaired aerobic exercise capacity.
May underlie exercise intolerance in T2D; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
OBJECTIVE To assess the relationship between subclinical cardiac dysfunction and aerobic exercise capacity (peak VO2) in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D), a group at high risk of developing heart failure. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Cross-sectional study. We prospectively enrolled a multiethnic cohort of asymptomatic adults with T2D and no history, signs, or symptoms of cardiovascular disease. Age-, sex-, and ethnicity-matched control subjects were recruited for comparison. Participants underwent bioanthropometric profiling, cardiopulmonary exercise testing, and cardiovascular magnetic resonance with adenosine stress perfusion imaging. Multivariable linear regression analysis was undertaken to identify independent associations between measures of cardiovascular structure and function and peak VO2. RESULTS A total of 247 adults with T2D (aged 51.8 ± 11.9 years, 55% males, 37% black or south Asian ethnicity, HbA1c 7.4 ± 1.1% [57 ± 12 mmol/mol], and duration of diabetes 61 [32–120] months) and 78 control subjects were included. Subjects with T2D had increased concentric left ventricular remodeling, reduced myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR), and markedly lower aerobic exercise capacity (peak VO2 18.0 ± 6.6 vs. 27.8 ± 9.0 mL/kg/min; P < 0.001) compared with control subjects. In a multivariable linear regression model containing age, sex, ethnicity, smoking status, and systolic blood pressure, only MPR (β = 0.822; P = 0.006) and left ventricular diastolic filling pressure (E/e′) (β = −0.388; P = 0.001) were independently associated with peak VO2 in subjects with T2D. CONCLUSIONS In a multiethnic cohort of asymptomatic people with T2D, MPR and diastolic function are key determinants of aerobic exercise capacity, independent of age, sex, ethnicity, smoking status, or blood pressure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gulsin et al. (2020) conducted a cross-sectional in Type 2 diabetes (n=325). Type 2 diabetes vs. Age-, sex-, and ethnicity-matched control subjects was evaluated on Aerobic exercise capacity (peak VO2) (p=<0.001). Adults with type 2 diabetes had lower aerobic exercise capacity than controls (peak VO2 18.0 vs. 27.8 mL/kg/min; P<0.001), independently determined by myocardial perfusion and diastolic function.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: