Key result
Elective coronary stent implantation in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock resulted in 100% successful deployment and 72% survival to hospital discharge.
Why the study?
Does elective coronary stent implantation improve clinical and angiographic outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock?
Observational (n=18)
Does elective coronary stent implantation improve clinical and angiographic outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock?
Elective coronary stenting in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock is feasible, yielding high procedural success and significant improvements in left ventricular function at 6 months.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support elective stenting feasibility in AMI shock; leaves open efficacy versus standard care.
Effective treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock depends on restoring persistent patency of the infarct-related artery. Coronary stenting, reducing abrupt or delayed closure related to dissection and suboptimal result, may improve PTCA results in cardiogenic shock. Eighteen patients (14 males and 4 females, mean age 59 +/- 7 years), referred to catheterization laboratory for acute myocardial infarction and shock, had elective stent implantation during 14 primary and 4 rescue PTCA. Time delay between shock onset and PTCA was 4.1 +/- 3 hr (range, 30 min to 12 hr). The IRA was LAD in seven patients (38%), LCx in two (11%), and RCA in eight (45%). One patient (5.%) had distal LMCA occlusion. Stent deployment was successful in 100% of patients and resulted in TIMI 3 flow in 13 (72%) patients. In 13 (72%) cases, cardiogenic shock gradually resolved and the patients were discharged alive. Five patients (28%) died because of irreversible hemodynamic deterioration without evidence of reinfarction. At 6-month follow-up, all the discharged patients were alive and no patient had reinfarction or recurrent angina. Heart transplant was required in one patient 5 months after stenting because of refractory congestive heart failure. Angiography demonstrated patency of all the coronary arteries treated, with TIMI 3 flow in all patients. Stent restenosis rate was 30%, and target lesion revascularization with CABG or re-PTCA was not required in any case. LV function improved from 39% +/- 15% to 51% +/- 15% (P < 0.01). Elective coronary stenting is an effective treatment for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock and may improve acute and long-term survival.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fabbiocchi et al. (2000) conducted an observational in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (n=18). Elective coronary stent implantation was evaluated on survival to hospital discharge. Elective coronary stent implantation in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock resulted in 100% successful deployment and 72% survival to hospital discharge.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: