Key result
The lateral approach for supraclavicular brachial plexus block significantly increased the rate of totally effective blockade (88% vs 64%) and reduced vascular punctures (4% vs 24%) compared to the conventional approach.
Why the study?
Does the lateral approach for supraclavicular brachial plexus block improve success rate and reduce complications compared to the conventional approach in patients undergoing upper extremity surgery?
RCT (n=50)
Single-blind
Computer generated random number tables
No
Does the lateral approach for supraclavicular brachial plexus block improve success rate and reduce complications compared to the conventional approach in patients undergoing upper extremity surgery?
Absolute Event Rate: 88% vs 64%
p-value: p=0.035
The lateral approach for supraclavicular brachial plexus block using a nerve stimulator provides a higher success rate and fewer vascular punctures than the conventional approach, despite a longer procedure time.
Supports adopting lateral supraclavicular block for higher success and safety; extends RCT evidence on technique optimization.
Traditionally Supraclavicular Brachial plexus block is the commonly performed block for upper extremity surgeries. The Problems associated with this technique include inadequate block, failed block, direct injury to the nerves, pneumothorax, phrenic nerve palsy and vascular puncture etc. Recently lateral approach for supraclavicular brachial plexus block is gaining popularity because of its less complications and high success rate. The aim of the study is to compare the efficacy of lateral approach with conventional approach for supraclavicular brachial plexus block. METHODS: Fifty patients of ASA grade I and II scheduled for upper extremity surgery (below the midarm) were randomly allocated into two groups of 25 each. Group C was randomly allocated to receive supraclavicular brachial plexus block by conventional approach. Group L was randomly allocated to receive supraclavicular brachial plexus by lateral approach. Both the groups were given 10ml of 1.5% lignocaine and 15ml of 0.5% ropivacaine (total volume 25 ml).The parameters assessed were the onset and duration of sensory and motor blockade, time taken for the procedure, need for supplementation of anaesthesia, adverse effects, tourniquet tolerance and success rate. Statistical analysis was done using appropriate tests, (p<0.05) was considered statistically significant. We concluded that lateral approach for supraclavicular brachial plexus block using peripheral nerve stimulator, is a better alternative to conventional approach in terms of higher success rate and lesser complication rate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Prasad et al. (2014) conducted an RCT in Elective upper extremity surgery (n=50). Lateral approach for supraclavicular brachial plexus block vs. Conventional approach for supraclavicular brachial plexus block was evaluated on Totally effective block (success rate) (p=0.035). The lateral approach for supraclavicular brachial plexus block significantly increased the rate of totally effective blockade (88% vs 64%) and reduced vascular punctures (4% vs 24%) compared to the conventional approach.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: