Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Issue addressed The lack of a systematic approach to collecting family violence data after a disaster impedes family violence prevention and response efforts. Without evidence, there is little chance that interventions will be planned and implemented to address increased family violence after disasters. Methods A literature review of international and Australian gendered disaster research was conducted, with a focus on family violence following disasters in developed countries. A case study was prepared exploring the complexity of gathering data about family violence in the aftermath of the Victorian Black Saturday bushfires. Results Although increases in family violence in the aftermath of the Black Saturday bushfire were observed and anecdotally reported by funded family violence agencies, recovery authorities and community leaders, attempts by Women's Health in the North and the researchers to quantify the increase were unsuccessful. The fragmented nature of the family violence data that was collected was a consequence of inconsistent data recording practices and the complex and multifaceted nature of the recovery effort. Conclusions Health promotion theory and service planning demand a sound evidence base for interventions. In the absence of this, family violence following disasters will continue to be overlooked in the face of ‘urgent’ needs. So what? Disaster research that considers family violence should be conducted in Australia. Government and non-government agencies involved in disaster planning, recovery and reconstruction need to focus on producing data on the occurrence of family violence in this context, and train emergency and reconstruction workers in the dynamics of family violence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Parkinson et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: