Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: I to triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cells in vivo. METHODS: I-CLR1404 (CLR 124) was investigated using micro-positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) in conjunction with a Monte Carlo dosimetry platform to estimate CLR 125 dosimetry. In vivo antitumor efficacy was tested by injecting nude mice bearing either MDA-MB-231-luc orthotopic xenografts or lung metastases with 74 MBq (3.7 GBq/kg) of CLR 125 or an equivalent mass amount of nonradiolabeled CLR 125. Longitudinal tumor measurements using calipers and bioluminescence imaging were obtained for the xenografts and lung metastases, respectively. RESULTS: Dosimetry analysis estimated that CLR 125 would impart the largest absorbed dose to the tumor per injected activity (0.261 ± 0.023 Gy/MBq) while the bone marrow, which is generally the dose-limiting organ for CLR1404, appears to have the lowest (0.063 ± 0.005 Gy/MBq). At administered activities of up to 74 MBq (3.7 GBq/kg), mice did not experience signs of toxicity. In addition, a single dose of CLR 125 reduced the volume of orthotopic primary TNBC xenografts by ∼60% compared to control vehicle (p < 0.001) and significantly extended survival. In addition, CLR 125 was efficacious against preclinical metastatic TNBC models by inhibiting the progression of micrometastases (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Targeted radionuclide therapy with CLR 125 displayed significant antitumor efficacy in vivo, suggesting promise for treatment of TNBC micrometastases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grudzinski et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: