Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Electron capture and loss cross sections for U 28+ colliding with H 2 , N 2 and Ar were measured at 3.5 and 6.5 MeV/u. These data were used to benchmark n -body calculations using the classical trajectory Monte Carlo method. The n -body calculations include electrons on both nuclear centres and all electron–electron and electron–nuclear interactions between each centre. For the U 28+ ion, 36 electrons were incorporated in the calculations (4s 2 4p 6 4d 10 4f 14 5s 2 5p 2 ), while for the H, N and Ar targets all electrons were used except those for the K-shell of Ar, leading to 39-, 45- and 54-body calculations, respectively. Projectile electron loss was predicted for U 28+ at energies from 2 to 150 MeV/u. Only for the H-target did the projectile electron loss cross section decrease approximately as E −1 . The heavier targets exhibited slower energy dependences, contrary to the E −1 prediction of one-electron theories. Moreover, the collisional interactions are quite strong with an average of 1.64 and 2.88 electrons removed from the U 28+ ion at 10 MeV/u in each collision with N and Ar, respectively. These data and calculations were used to assess the vacuum requirements for the SIS-100 synchrotron ring under construction at GSI-Darmstadt. For the residual gases expected to be in the ring, the U 28+ lifetime was found to be essentially constant as a function of projectile energy, leading to very stringent vacuum requirements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Olson et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: