Key result
Treatment of aorta-iliac aneurysms with flared iliac limb stent grafts was associated with a higher rate of reintervention due to endoleak type 1b compared to nonflared grafts (7.2% vs 1.9%; p<0.02).
Why the study?
EVAR outcomes depend on landing zone quality and reinterventions are elevated with suboptimal zones, prompting evaluation of reintervention rates after treating aorta-iliac aneurysms with flared iliac limbs.
Does a flared iliac limb stent graft increase the reintervention rate in patients undergoing EVAR for aorta-iliac aneurysms?
Cohort (n=179)
No
Does a flared iliac limb stent graft increase the reintervention rate in patients undergoing EVAR for aorta-iliac aneurysms?
Absolute Event Rate: 7.2% vs 1.9%
p-value: p=< 0.02
The use of flared iliac limbs with a distal diameter of ≥ 20 mm during EVAR is associated with a significantly higher rate of reintervention due to type 1b endoleaks.
Supports cautious EVAR landing zone strategies with flared limbs; leaves open randomized confirmation of reintervention impact.
Endovascular abdominal aneurysm repair (EVAR) relies on the quality of the proximal and distal landing zone. Reinterventions are higher in patients with suboptimal landing zone. The study aimed to evaluate reintervention rate after endovascular treatment of an aorta-iliac aneurysm using the flared iliac limbs. The retrospective study included 179 patients treated with EVAR at a single university hospital institution from January 2011 to January 2014 of which 75 patients (42%) were treated with flared iliac limb stent graft and 104 patients (58%) were treated with a nonflared iliac limb stent graft. There were 165 male patients (92%), mean age was 75.8 ± 6.6 years. Thirty-six patients underwent secondary treatment accounting for overall reintervention rate of 20%. Endoleak type 1b occurred in 13 patients (7%), followed by endoleak type 1a in six patients (3%). Endoleak type 2 occurred in seven patients (4%) requiring the treatment due to abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) enlargement, endoleak type 3 in three patients (2%), and leg stent graft thrombosis in seven patients (4%). In 143 patients (80%), there were no secondary interventions during the follow-up period. Reintervention due to endoleak type 1b was statistically significantly higher in a flared iliac limb group (p < 0.02) with the rate of 7.2% compared with 1.9% rate in nonflared iliac limb group. The mean follow-up was 44.3 ± 20.4. Overall mortality was 33%. Flared iliac limb with a distal diameter of ≥ 20 mm, show a higher rate of iliac limb reintervention in a follow-up period due to endoleak type 1b.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Balezantis et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Aorta-iliac aneurysms (n=179). Flared iliac limb stent graft vs. Nonflared iliac limb stent graft was evaluated on Reintervention due to endoleak type 1b (p=< 0.02). Treatment of aorta-iliac aneurysms with flared iliac limb stent grafts was associated with a higher rate of reintervention due to endoleak type 1b compared to nonflared grafts (7.2% vs 1.9%; p<0.02).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: