Nationwide cohort study finds comparable neurological outcomes in school-age cardiac arrest witnessed by peers versus older bystanders, suggesting the vital value of bystander CPR.
AIM: Using the data from the All-Japan Utstein Registry, this study evaluates the neurologically favourable patient outcomes and associated factors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) with Japanese schoolchildren as witnesses. METHODS: We analysed 1,068 school-age children (6-18 years old) who underwent OHCA from 2011 to 2016. Among the 1,068 cases, 179 were witnessed by schoolchildren and 889 were witnessed by other bystanders. Propensity score-matched and logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the outcomes and associated factors. RESULTS: = 0.602). The multivariable logistic regression analyses of school-age OHCA with schoolchildren as witnesses demonstrated that bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) provision (odds ratio [OR] 4.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.44-11.75), shockable initial rhythm (OR 3.39, 95% CI 1.43-8.04), and defibrillation (OR 4.58, 95% CI 1.65-12.71) provided by any bystander were positively associated with favourable outcomes. By contrast, dispatcher-assisted CPR provision (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.11-0.70), exogenous cause (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.03-0.86), adrenaline administration (0.25; 95% CI 0.07-0.92), and prolonged response time (OR 0.86; 95% CI 0.75-0.98) were negatively associated with favourable outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Patient outcomes did not differ significantly between schoolchildren- and other-bystander-witnessed cases of school-age OHCA. Although schoolchildren as witnesses might not be inferior to other bystanders in school-age OHCA, further studies are needed to examine the effect of bystander CPR by schoolchildren and basic life support education in schools.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kurosaki et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: