This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
One and 2 micrograms of prostaglandin F2 alpha isopropyl ester (PGF2 alpha -IE) applied topically to the rabbit eye caused a biphasic response. The hypotensive phase was dose-dependent with a maximum reduction in intraocular pressure (IOP) of 9.4 +/- 1.7 mmHg at a dose of 2 micrograms. In beagles, 0.4 to 2 micrograms topical PGF2 alpha-IE resulted in a sustained IOP reduction; 2 micrograms produced the maximum reduction of 7-9 mmHg. No initial hypertensive response was observed. Iloprost phenacyl ester (Iloprost-PE) caused a greater decrease in IOP when dissolved in 0.5% hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (AT) than in saline. In rabbits, doses of 0.1 to 1 microgram in AT caused a biphasic response with a sustained IOP decrease fluctuating between 7 and 8 mmHg. In beagles 1 and 2 micrograms Iloprost-PE resulted in a mean IOP reduction of 5.8 +/- 0.4 mmHg and 5.8 +/- 0.5 mmHg (P less than 0.005), respectively; the decrease persisted for 5 hrs. No initial hypertensive response was observed. In beagles PGF2 alpha-IE induced a strong miosis lasting more than 6 hours; Iloprost-PE had no effect on pupil size. Both PG-esters induced a slight hyperemia in rabbit and beagle eyes. In rabbits Iloprost-PE affects the blood-aqueous barrier more than PGF2 alpha-IE, since higher protein concentrations are seen in the aqueous humor after application of Iloprost-PE. Neither PG-ester had a noticeable effect on aqueous protein in beagles. In rabbits, both PG-esters led to slightly increased aqueous humor cyclic-AMP concentrations. In beagles aqueous humor cyclic-AMP was elevated only after Iloprost-PE.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Groeneboer et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: