Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The stability constants of the 1:1 complexes formed between Mg2+, Mn2+, Co2+, Ni2+ or Cd2+ (= M2+) and the anionic 5(6)-nitrobenzimidazolate [= (NBI–H)−] or 5,6-dinitrobenzimidazolate [= (DNBI–H)−] were determined by potentiometric pH titrations in aqueous solution (25 °C; I = 0.5 M, NaNO3). The acidity constants for the deprotonation of the (N1)H sites in neutral NBI and DNBI (= L) were measured by the same method. The comparison of the stability constants determined for the M(L–H)+ complexes with those calculated from log KMLM versus pKHLHstraight-line plots, which were established recently for neutral benzimidazole-type ligands, reveals that the stabilities of the M(L–H)+ complexes are significantly enhanced, as one might have expected due to the negative charge present on the ligands. Of course, the electron-withdrawing properties of (N3)-bound metal ions facilitate the release of the proton from the (N1)H site in the M(NBI)2+ and M(DNBI)2+ complexes, if compared to the situation in the free ligands. The effect of a metal ion bound to a benzimidazolate or imidazolate residue on the coordination tendency toward a further metal ion (giving rise to an imidazolate bridge) was estimated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kapinos et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: