Key result
High concentrations of diprafenone and 5-OHDP depress smooth muscle and neural function at 4 to 40 times the antiarrhythmic concentration, making major peripheral side effects unlikely in humans.
Why the study?
Do diprafenone and its metabolite 5-OHDP have different peripheral side effect profiles compared to standard class I antiarrhythmic agents in preclinical models?
Do diprafenone and its metabolite 5-OHDP have different peripheral side effect profiles compared to standard class I antiarrhythmic agents in preclinical models?
Diprafenone and its active metabolite 5-OHDP exhibit depressant effects on smooth muscle and neural function only at concentrations 4-40 times higher than antiarrhythmic levels, suggesting a low likelihood of major peripheral side effects at therapeutic doses in humans.
May support wider safety margin versus class I agents in models; leaves open human translation and comparative trials.
This study compareo the effects of diprafenone, a new class lc antiarrhythmic agent, and 5‐hydroxydiprafenone (5‐OHDP), an active metabolite of diprafenone, to standard class l antiarrhythmic agents (propafenone, flecainide, or lidocaine), in several pharmacologic models, to ascertain the potential for side effects relative to the currently available class l antiarrhythmic agents. Diprafenone and propafenone decreased blood pressure and heart rate in anesthetized rabbits at 3 and 7 mg/kg, i.v., respectively. Neuromuscular transmission in rabbit gastrocnemius muscle was partially (38%) inhibited after 3 mg/kg of diprafenone and 7 mg/kg of propafenone. Diprafenone and 5‐OHDP (10−4M), but not lidocaine, inhibited aggregation of human platelets evoked by sodium arachidonate and adenosine diphosphate. Diprafenone, fleoainide, and 5‐OHDP (10−4M) inhibited the contractile responses of guinea pig vas deferens to norepinephrine and spontaneous and bradykinin‐evoked contractions of the guinea pig uteri. Diprafenone and 5‐OHDP, but not flecainide, relaxed rabbit bronchial smooth muscle contracted by acetylcholine. Diprafenone, 5‐OHDP and propafenone (10−5M and 10−4M) also depressed the contractile responses of canine mesenteric arteries to transmural nerve stimulation. Thus, high concentrations of diprafenone (10−5M and 10−4M) depress smooth muscle and neural function. The depressant effects occur with 4ndash;40 times the antiarrhythmic concentration of diprafenone and are shared by propafenone and, in part, by 5‐OHDP and flecainide. It is unlikely that major peripheral side effects will occur with therapeutic doses of diprafenone in man.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Greenberg et al. (1989) studied this question. Diprafenone and 5-hydroxydiprafenone vs. Propafenone, flecainide, or lidocaine was evaluated on Pharmacologic effects on smooth muscle, neural function, and platelet aggregation. High concentrations of diprafenone and 5-OHDP depress smooth muscle and neural function at 4 to 40 times the antiarrhythmic concentration, making major peripheral side effects unlikely in humans.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: