Why the study?
CMR is the gold standard for calculating heart size, volume, and mass, but dedicated software is required to perform segmentation.
Does an open-source CMR segmentation tool perform comparably to vendor-validated CMR42 software for cardiac segmentation?
Does an open-source CMR segmentation tool perform comparably to vendor-validated CMR42 software for cardiac segmentation?
The study aims to validate a free, open-source plugin for CMR segmentation against established commercial software.
Open-source CMR tools may match commercial software for research segmentation; leaves open routine clinical adoption pending prospective validation.
Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is the gold standard for heart size, volume and mass calculation, but a dedicated software is needed to perform the segmentation process. The aim of the study was to validate the performance of an opensource CMR segmentation tool against the latest version of vendor-validated CMR42 software.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Szychta et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: