Key result
Older ventricular leads linked to ~51 Ω higher impedance than newer leads, with unchanged pacing thresholds.
Why the study?
Patients with permanent pacemakers require regular follow-up, and parameters recorded during follow-up visits might have potential for diagnostic studies.
Does lead age affect lead impedance and pacing parameters in patients with permanent pacemakers?
Cross-Sectional (n=127)
Does lead age affect lead impedance and pacing parameters in patients with permanent pacemakers?
Absolute Event Rate: 512% vs 461%
Ventricular lead impedance increases with lead age (>10 years), though pacing thresholds and percentage of ventricular pacing remain unaffected.
Higher impedance in older leads does not imply dysfunction; leaves open effects on long-term lead performance.
BackgroundPatients with permanent pacemakers should be followed up regularly and parameters recorded during the follow-up visits might have potential for further diagnostic studies. Material and methodsA pilot cross-sectional study on 127 consecutive patients who underwent pacemaker follow-up was performed. ResultsThe study revealed that patients with older ventricular leads (more than 10 years) have higher lead impedance in comparison with patients with newer ventricular leads (less than 10 years) -512 Ω vs 461 Ω (median values), with no differences in pacing thresholds, percentage of ventricular pacing, presence of ventricular high rate episodes or status of absolute pacemaker dependency. ConclusionsThis study demonstrates that parameters obtained from a regular pacemaker check-up differ according to variables such as lead age, which opens a new field for studies investigating other variables (e.g.disease biomarkers) in correlation with parameters from the pacemaker check-up.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kowara et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Permanent pacemakers (n=127). Older ventricular leads (>10 years) vs. Newer ventricular leads (<10 years) was evaluated on Lead impedance. Older ventricular leads (>10 years) were associated with higher median lead impedance compared to newer leads (<10 years) (512 Ω vs 461 Ω), with no differences in pacing thresholds.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: