Key result
Preshaped LV pacing lead achieves ~86% implant success, but pacing thresholds rise through 7 months.
Why the study?
This study was undertaken to describe the long-term clinical experience with a new preshaped left ventricular pacing lead.
Observational (n=62)
Yes
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Preshaped LV leads show high implant success in this cohort; leaves open long-term stability and outcome benefits versus standard leads.
This study describes a long-term experience with a new LV pacing lead. The study population consisted of 62 patients (85% men, 71 +/- 10 years old) with advanced dilated cardiomyopathy, in NYHA Class III or IV despite optimal drug therapy, and a QRS duration > 150 ms. Patients in sinus rhythm were implanted with a triple chamber pacemaker to maintain atrioventricular synchrony. A dual chamber pacemaker was implanted in patients in atrial fibrillation for biventricular pacing only. A clinical evaluation and interrogation of the resynchronization pacemaker were performed at implant, at 1 week (W1), one (M1), four (M4), and seven (M7) months after implantation. A longer follow-up (2 years) is available for patients implanted at the authors institution. LV measurements were pacing threshold at 0.5-ms pulse duration and pacing impedance. R wave amplitude (mV) was measured at the time of implantation only. The system was successfully implanted in 86% of patients with the latest design of the lead. Mean R wave amplitude at implant was 15 +/- 7 mV and mean pacing impedance was 1054 +/- 254 omega. Between implant (n = 38) and M7 (n = 15), pacing threshold rose from 0.73 +/- 0.54 to 1.57 +/- 0.60 V (P < 0.001). In conclusion, the situs lead was successfully implanted in a high percentage of patients. In addition, low pacing threshold and high impedance measured during follow-up are consistent with a low pacing current drain, ensuring a durable pulse generator longevity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ollitrault et al. (2003) conducted an observational in Advanced dilated cardiomyopathy (n=62). Preshaped left ventricular pacing lead (situs lead) was evaluated on Implant success rate and LV pacing threshold at 7 months (p=<0.001). The preshaped LV pacing lead achieved an 86% implant success rate, with mean pacing threshold rising from 0.73 to 1.57 V over 7 months (P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: