Key result
In low- to intermediate-risk patients with chest pain, a negative cCTA was associated with a 1-month pooled MACE rate of 0.09% compared to 0.23% for exercise stress testing (p=1).
Why the study?
The risk of MACE at 1, 6, and 12 months after a negative cCTA, ECG stress test, stress echocardiography, and MPS in low- to intermediate-risk patients needed to be described.
What is the risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 1, 6, and 12 months after negative advanced testing in low- to intermediate-risk chest pain patients?
Meta-Analysis
What is the risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 1, 6, and 12 months after negative advanced testing in low- to intermediate-risk chest pain patients?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Low- to intermediate-risk chest pain patients with negative advanced testing in the past 12 months have a very low risk of MACE and can be safely discharged without further risk stratification if ECG and troponin are reassuring.
Objectives Our primary objective was to describe the risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 1, 6, and 12 months after a negative coronary computed tomography angiogram (cCTA), electrocardiogram (ECG) stress test, stress echocardiography, and myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) in low‐ to intermediate‐risk patients. Methods Initially, 952 articles were identified for screening, 81 met criteria for full‐text review, and once risk of bias was assessed, 33 articles were included in this meta‐analysis. We utilized a random‐effects model to assess pooled MACE event proportion for patients undergoing evaluation of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) when risk stratified to a low‐ to intermediate‐risk category after undergoing standard testing. Heterogeneity analysis was performed using Cochrane's Q‐test and I2 statistic. Results Twenty‐one studies evaluated follow‐up at 1 month with cCTA having a 0.09% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.03% to 0.26%) pooled MACE compared to 0.23% (95% CI = 0.01% to 5.8%) of the exercise stress testing (p = 1). MPS and cCTA had an overall event rate of 0.15% (95% CI = 0.06% to 0.41%) at 6 months (I2 = 0%). At 12 months, a subgroup analysis found a pooled cCTA MACE of 0.16% (95% CI = 0.04% to 0.65%) compared to 1.68% (95% CI = 0.01% to 2.6%) for stress echocardiography with low within‐group heterogeneity (I2 = 0%). Subgroup analysis of cCTA with no disease versus nonobstructive disease (<50% stenosis) did not find statistical difference in the MACE at both 1 month (0.17% [95% CI = 0.04% to 0.67%] vs. 0.06% [95% CI = 0.01% to 0.34%]) and 12 months (0.44% [95% CI = 0.09% to 2.2% vs. 0.54% [95% CI = 0.19% to 1.5%]). Conclusions Patients presenting with chest pain who have a coronary CTA showing < 50% stenosis, negative ECG stress test, stress echocardiography, or stress myocardial perfusion scan in the past 12 months can be discharged without any further risk stratification if their ECG and troponin are reassuring given low MACE.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mehta et al. (2021) conducted a meta-analysis in Chest pain / Acute coronary syndrome. Negative coronary computed tomography angiogram (cCTA) vs. Exercise stress testing was evaluated on Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 1 month (p=1). In low- to intermediate-risk patients with chest pain, a negative cCTA was associated with a 1-month pooled MACE rate of 0.09% compared to 0.23% for exercise stress testing (p=1).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: